Support 100 years of independent journalism.

Elon Musk’s Twitter utopia can never be realised

It’s impossible to create a social media platform where everyone is happy, no matter who is in charge.

By Sarah Manavis

It’s confirmed: Elon Musk is buying Twitter. The richest man in the world has struck a deal with the platform worth $44bn. This is bad news on multiple levels. It’s bad for the distribution of power in the world, it’s bad for the power of Big Tech and it’s bad for “free speech”. (While Musk says that he wants to secure free speech, that sometimes comes at the cost of people less powerful than him.)

But what does all of this actually mean for Twitter as a platform? 

Many of those outraged by Musk’s acquisition are specifically concerned about how he might change the way that Twitter functions. Will he introduce an edit button? Dangerously lax moderation? Or worst of all, reinstate the account of Donald Trump? They fear Twitter will get much worse, even unusable; that they’ll open their apps next week to find a completely different platform, full of violent imagery, abuse and an endless stream of unchecked pro-Trump content. While all of this is technically possible — and if the last decade has taught us anything, it’s to not discount the most far-fetched outcome — it seems far more plausible that the changes we will see under Musk will be much less dramatic.  

From what we know so far, it seems Musk has bought Twitter on a gut feeling rather than with a clear vision to overhaul the platform in mind. So far the changes he’s mentioned are relatively light, and are far from original, such as getting rid of full bans and introducing temporary “timeouts” or turning Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters into a homeless shelter (it seems unlikely the latter will actually come to pass). Many of the changes people fear Musk might introduce were already on Twitter’s agenda for this year and next: the edit button has, apparently, been in the works for several months; and the company was already intending to address letting Trump back on to the platform, especially given his apparent plans to run as a candidate in the 2024 US presidential election. And when it comes to moderation, it may prove to be more of a headache than a liberation to reduce it significantly, with content such as child abuse proliferating even under current levels of moderation

It also seems likely that Musk hasn’t considered the boring logistics of running Twitter, a platform that has struggled to keep up with its contemporaries and which is about to come up against new rules in the UK and EU that may make it more demanding to run. Moderation changes also risk losing advertisers and breaking laws, which again may impede Musk’s mission.

[See also: If only freedom of speech was as simple as Elon Musk thinks]

But the outcry over Musk’s ownership reveals a more fundamental issue: the ideal of what Twitter should be can never exist. There’s a contingent of Twitter users who believe the platform should be purely a fun, harmonious space where the content you believe is bad doesn’t exist. At the other end of the spectrum are those who believe that even most hideous things should be allowed to be shared ad nauseam, with no repercussions. It’s impossible to create a social media utopia where everyone is happy because it will always be at odds with someone else’s vision. It’s easy to act as though Musk is the problem, but he merely represents a divide that runs much deeper. 

Content from our partners
Is your business ready for corporate climate reporting?
How do we secure the hybrid office?
How materials innovation can help achieve net zero and level-up the UK

Of course, even in a matter of a few weeks, I could be proved wrong about all of this. Twitter could become an unmoderated cesspit of scams, hate speech and violent imagery that makes it effectively unusable, and Musk could simply shrug off fines and legal issues with his endless cash. However, it feels likely that the reality will be much more dull: a Twitter that’s ever so slightly worse, but not bad enough to force the majority of users to leave.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Topics in this article: ,