Support 100 years of independent journalism.

Can Joe Biden’s diplomacy stop Russia from invading Ukraine?

Repeated warnings from the West have not defused tensions along the Russia-Ukraine border.

By Ido Vock

BERLIN — Representatives of the US and Russia are due to meet in Geneva on 9 and 10 January, amid an ongoing build-up of Russian troops at the border with Ukraine, which Western governments believe could presage an invasion. The summit comes in the wake of a call held between the US president, Joe Biden, and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, on 30 December last year.

Western leaders have been uneasy about the possibility that Moscow could order an invasion of its neighbour since US intelligence first raised the alarm about a Russian troop build-up on the border with Ukraine in November. Moscow could be preparing to attack as soon as early 2022, Washington warned last month. Well, it’s early 2022 now. Is war imminent?

Repeated warnings from the West against an invasion have not, so far, succeeded in defusing tensions. Tens of thousands of Russian troops remain stationed at the border. Around 10,000 Russian troops were recently called back, but the US reportedly does not view the move as a significant drawdown of Russia’s invasion preparations.

The US and its allies are doing, they say, the most they can to avoid renewed conflict. In his 30 December call with Putin, the second that month, Biden again threatened dire economic sanctions on Russia if it attacked its neighbour. US officials have indicated that any sanctions would be further reaching than those imposed on Russia in 2014, when Moscow seized Crimea from Ukraine.

Yet fresh measures designed to cripple Russia’s economy will have already been factored in by the Kremlin if it does decide on war. Moscow and Kyiv will both be well aware that few Western leaders are likely to send troops to die for Ukraine, which is not a member of the Nato alliance.

Last month, Russia issued a set of demands for the US and Nato. They included that weaponry be removed from countries that joined the alliance after 1997, such as the Baltic states and Poland, and that promises of eventual membership for Georgia and Ukraine be revoked. The demands are widely viewed as unrealistic. Some observers see them as designed to be rejected out of hand, offering Moscow a ready-made casus belli in a confrontation where Russia has already invested too much to back down without receiving concessions. The stakes for the upcoming US-Russia talks, then, are high.

Content from our partners
The green transition can unlock 40,000 new businesses and £175bn
Building the business case for growth
“On supporting farmers, McDonald’s sets a high standard”

A clue for one possible outcome may lie in a cryptic sentence from a press conference Putin gave last month. “The future of Donbas must be decided by the people who live in Donbas,” the Russian president told assembled journalists. The Donbas region of eastern Ukraine has been under the control of pro-Russian separatists since 2014. “A Crimean scenario?” speculated Alexei Venediktov, the editor of the liberal radio station Echo of Moscow, a reference to the hastily organised referendum that preceded the annexation of Russia’s newest federal subject.

A sham vote on unification with Russia, the result of which would be pre-ordained, will be certain to draw the ire of the West, which would impose heavy sanctions immediately. But it could offer Russia a means of saving face in this high-stakes confrontation.

[See also: Ten crucial questions about the world in 2022]

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Topics in this article : , ,