Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. World
15 April 2020updated 27 Jul 2021 12:42pm

Donald Trump is scapegoating the World Health Organisation to disguise his own blunders

The president’s vow to suspend funding to WHO is a dangerous distraction from the pandemic. 

By Emily Tamkin

A week after threatening to withhold funding from the World Health Organisation, Donald Trump announced yesterday (15 April) that the US would suspend payments to the international body. 

“Today I’m instructing my administration to halt funding of the World Health Organisation while a review is conducted to assess the World Health Organisation’s role in severely mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus,” Trump said, adding that “one of the most dangerous and costly decisions from the WHO was its disastrous decision to oppose travel restrictions from China and other nations”. Trump noted that he, by contrast, had suspended travel from China.

Aside from the fact that the US did not, as Trump has repeatedly claimed, suspend all travel from China, there are several problems with the announcement. For one thing, it is as yet unclear how funding will be suspended, as it is largely appropriated by Congress. As others have speculated, Trump could propose to withhold congressionally appropriated funds under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, but that would require congressional approval within 45 days.

But the world, watching on as Trump rants, is perhaps less concerned by the technicalities of the suspension than by the president’s willingness to act at this particular point in time. As UN secretary general Antonio Guterres said in a statement, “It is also not the time to reduce the resources for the operations of the World Health Organisation or any other humanitarian organisation in the fight against the virus.” The US is the WHO’s biggest donor.

The WHO’s closeness to China is, as experts on multilateral organisations have explained, in part because of the vacuum left by the US under Trump. China is able to play world leader – while spending far less than the US in support of international organisations – partly because the American president, for instance, bashes the WHO rather than assembling a credible international response to coronavirus. 

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

China said it was “seriously concerned” by Trump’s announcement, and it is not the only country to take notice. Russia, which has done its own coronavirus diplomacy, sending protective equipment (some of which turned out to be faulty on arrival) abroad, called Trump’s decision “selfish”. 

Content from our partners
The cost-of-living crisis is hitting small businesses – Liz Truss must act
How industry is key for net zero
How to ensure net zero brings good growth and green jobs

But for US citizens, there is also the stark context of the announcement. Though the WHO did bungle its response – tweeting on 14 January that “preliminary investigations have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus” – that is not the reason that the US, specifically, has the most known Covid-19 cases of any country. It is not the reason that on 14 April, the same day that Trump bashed the WHO, the US recorded an additional 2,228 deaths due to the disease, which has become the country’s leading cause of death. 

The WHO had Covid-19 tests on offer, but the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention produced its own tests, which did not work, had to be recalled, and left America trailing. Though the US reported its first case to the WHO on the same day as South Korea, the latter, through testing and tracing, was able to reduce its case numbers, while America’s grew. What’s more, while the WHO may have tweeted in mid-January that it did not believe human transmission spread the virus, it did declare an emergency shortly thereafter. But nearly a month later, Trump was tweeting that the coronavirus “is very much under control in the USA!” 

“In reality our own govt experts were flashing red about the risk, as has been widely reported. They just couldn’t get through to POTUS,” tweeted Jeremy Konyndyk, who, during the Obama administration, served as the director of USAID’s Office of US Foreign Disaster Assistance. “This is not about WHO’s culpability or need for reform; it’s about creating a scapegoat for the [US government’s] own ineptness.”

The WHO, in other words, did make its mistakes, and its relationship to China is worthy of investigation – but the WHO is not the reason that the situation in the US deteriorated. That reason is standing in the White House, pointing fingers, and making announcements about suspending funding to the WHO.