Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. World
24 January 2019updated 09 Sep 2021 4:16pm

How did Venezuela end up with two presidents?

President Maduro has become more autocratic and governed increasingly erratically since taking office in 2013 as Hugo Chávez’s successor.

By Catesby Holmes

Just days after Venezuela’s authoritarian President Nicolás Maduro survived a 21 January military coup attempt, the leader of Venezuela’s opposition-dominated legislature declared himself the country’s interim president.

“I swear to formally assume the powers of the national executive as president in charge of Venezuela,” Juan Guaidó said on 23 January as he took the oath of office on a copy of the constitution before thousands of supporters in Caracas.

The opposition’s move to sideline Maduro came after a weekend of deadly protests demanding the president’s resignation, the first real popular uprising since security forces violently quashed a powerful opposition protest movement in 2017.

“Let’s swear as brothers that we won’t rest until we gain freedom,” Guaidó told the crowd, asking them to raise their right hands along with him.

The United States, Canada, Peru, Colombia and several other countries are supporting Guaidó, saying the legislature is the only democratically elected branch remaining in Venezuela’s government. But Maduro is refusing to step down.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

The internal power struggle has deepened turmoil in a country already reeling from simultaneous economic, political and humanitarian crises.

Content from our partners
Harnessing breakthrough thinking
Are we there yet with electric cars? The EV story – with Wejo
Sherif Tawfik: The Middle East and Africa are ready to lead on the climate

How did Venezuela end up with two presidents? Here’s what you need to know.

1. A contested vote

Maduro has become more autocratic and governed increasingly erratically since taking office in 2013 as Hugo Chávez’s successor.

His re-election as president in May 2018 – when Maduro won 68 per cent of the vote despite having an approval rating of just 21 per cent – was widely declared fraudulent.

“The ruling Socialist Party used all the power of its increasingly authoritarian regime to tip the May 2018 election in Maduro’s favor,” writes Miguel Angel Latouche, a professor at the Central University of Venezuela.

“For months, the regime coerced citizens to register as Socialist Party members, traded food for votes and blacklisted opposition candidates,” he writes. The government also called the elections several months early, preventing the opposition from organizing successful campaigns.

As electoral irregularities mounted, the opposition called on Venezuelans to boycott the presidential election.

“Fewer than half of Venezuela’s registered voters participated in the South American country’s May 2018 election, punishing a government they don’t support by simply not voting,” writes Latouche.

Maduro was nonetheless re-elected as president of Venezuela by a wide margin. His opponent, Henri Falcón, challenged the result, saying it “lacked legitimacy.”

2. How Maduro stayed in power

Some 50 other countries agreed with Falcón’s judgment, refusing to recognize Maduro as Venezuela’s rightful president. The United States and Europe passed harsh sanctions to punish his government.

In the months after his re-election, Maduro also survived an attempted coup, repeated calls by international leaders for a foreign military overthrow of his government and an assassination attempt by drone.

By late 2018, Maduro was heading a “cash-strapped rogue regime facing international condemnation and humanitarian crisis,” write Andrea Oelsner and Federico Merke, of Argentina’s San Andres University.

Yet Maduro’s grip on power remained strong for several reasons, say Oelsner and Merke.

Money is one major factor. Venezuela’s government is bankrupt, but Maduro “commands more than enough state resources to avoid a coup,” say Oelsner and Merke. “For years, the president has purchased the loyalty of Venezuela’s armed forces.”

The Ministry of Defense has now been put in charge of importing, producing, selling and distributing all food in Venezuela – a lucrative black market business in a country where people are starving.

Maduro has also “stacked his cabinet with generals,” Oelsner and Merke write, personally investing the military brass in his government’s survival.

The suffering of the Venezuelan people has actually helped Maduro, too, Oelsner and Merke find.

Between 2015 and 2017, Venezuelans lost, on average, 20 pounds, according to one 2017 study. Over one million people have fled the country in recent years, migrating to Colombia, Brazil, Ecuador and the U.S.

Those who remain “must devote hours every day just to finding food,” Oelsner and Merke write. “Starvation and endless food queues do not leave much time or energy for political resistance.”

3. What do Venezuelans want?

The opposition’s unilateral declaration of Guaidó as Venezuela’s interim president is just its latest effort to unseat Maduro.

There are only so many ways to democratically deal with authoritarian presidents, according to Venezuela expert David Smilde: vote them out of office, protest until they resign or make demands through face-to-face dialogue.

“Venezuelans have tried all three” since 2015, Smilde writes.

Now, the domestic power struggle gripping Venezuela could embolden Maduro’s international critics to take more drastic steps.

Even before Maduro’s contested re-election, President Donald Trump had floated the idea of a military invasion to overthrow his government.

“Venezuela is not very far away and the people are suffering, and they are dying,” said Trump in August 2017. “We have many options for Venezuela, including a possible military option if necessary.”

Several exiled Venezuela leaders have since embraced the idea.

“Military intervention by a coalition of regional forces may be the only way to end a man-made famine threatening millions of lives,” the former Venezuelan planning minister and Harvard professor Ricardo Hausmann wrote in January 2018.

In the view of “military option” supporters, Venezuelans would welcome a foreign intervention if it restored democracy.

That’s likely wrong, Smilde’s research shows.

Smilde asked the Venezuelan polling firm Datanálisis to ask several questions about options for leadership change in its November 2018 nationwide poll.

Only 35 per cent of respondents said they would support “a foreign military intervention to remove President Maduro from his position.” More than half would reject such an operation.

“All credible polling in Venezuela says that most Venezuelans desperately want Maduro out,” Smilde writes. But, he cautions, “that does not necessarily mean they are open to desperate measures.”

So what do Venezuelans want?

According to the Datanálisis survey, 63 per cent would support “a negotiated settlement to remove President Maduro from power.”

Smilde says that makes negotiations by far the most popular option for restoring democracy in Venezuela.

Catesby Holmes is global affairs editor at The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license, and is a roundup of stories from its archives. Read the original article.

Topics in this article :