Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. World
14 June 2017

France and Britain are living each other’s 1997 elections

The early-election-coming-back-to-haunt-you? The French do it better.

By Pauline Bock

A young, charismatic centrist sweeps a general election with a country-wide landslide in support of his liberal manifesto. Across the Channel, a seasoned centre right politician learns the hard way that calling an early election to increase a party’s parliamentary majority can spectacularly backfire.

This sounds like a fair summation of the past few weeks of 2017, but it could just as easily be two decades ago, as long as you’re prepared to switch around which country is which.

Politics in France and Britain have always been fundamentally opposed – different systems and constitutions, media cultures and leading figures, not to mention that small event in France when they killed all kings and queens – but in 2017, the two countries’ political developments seem to be mirroring each other. Or what they were, 20 years ago.

Emmanuel Macron has been compared to Tony Blair countless times, and the comparison seems fairly obvious. Just like his New Labour forerunner, the Europhile “Gallic Blair” has seduced the electorate, revolutionised his country’s politics, and is heading for a parliamentary majority that will allow him to comfortably push for his modernist reforms.

The real Blair even went so far as to send him his best wishes in a Le Monde column after Macron’s win in May. “Great exploit!” Blair wrote, offering his advice: “Focus on the most important matters, make sure measures have a real impact.” Macron (who has also been compared to John F Kennedy, Napoléon and Nicolas Sarkozy) is said to have enjoyed the compliment.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

But Britain, has also been imitating 1997 French politics. In April 1997, as Jacques Chirac’s centre right party RPR (now Les Républicains) controlled a vast majority in parliament and faced little opposition, the French president decided to dissolve the Assemblée Nationale and call a legislative election one year early, to gain a bigger majority in parliament and implement a series of reforms that autumn.

Content from our partners
How automation can help insurers keep pace with customer demand
How telecoms companies can unlock their growth potential through automation
The pandemic has had a scarring effect on loneliness, but we can do better

You can guess what happened next: it was a massive self-own, of the kind we’ve just seen from Theresa “strong and stable” May. In June 1997, the Socialist Party won 44 per cent of the vote, giving it a majority in the house and putting it far ahead of the 24 per cent secured by Chirac’s RPR. Instead of a strong-ish and stable-ish deal with the DUP, president Chirac was forced to recalibrate his government and to name a Socialist as his new prime minister, Lionel Jospin, in the “cohabitation”, the French version of the hung parliament.

Ironically, the move was also supposed to help Chirac carry out a referendum concerning the European Union, specifically about the euro. Perhaps David Cameron and Theresa May should have spent a little longer studying 1990s French politics.