Array
(
    [region] => WA
    [timezone] => America/Los_Angeles
    [org] => Microsoft Azure Cloud (westus2)
    [as] => AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
    [status] => success
    [country] => United States
    [countryCode] => US
    [isp] => Microsoft Corporation
    [city] => Quincy
    [lat] => 47.233001708984
    [query] => 207.46.13.25
    [regionName] => Washington
    [zip] => 98848
    [lon] => -119.85199737549
)
        

Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. World
22 June 2016

What is the OECD position on Brexit?

According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Brexit would be “a major negative shock to the UK economy”.

By New Statesman

The OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) has warned strongly against Brexit.

In its policy paper on the likely consequences of Britain leaving the EU, the OECD comes out firmly for remain, citing serious risks not only to the UK economy but to the rest of the OECD, especially European countries.

What are the dangers of Brexit that the OECD forsees?

According to OECD policy paper The Economic Consequences of Brexit: A Taxing Decision, leaving the EU “would be a major negative shock to the UK economy, with economic fallout in the rest of the OECD, particularly other European countries. In some respects, Brexit would be akin to a tax on GDP, imposing a persistent and rising cost on the economy that would not be incurred if the UK remained in the EU.”

The OECD predicts that by 2020, UK GDP would be more than 3 percent lower under Brexit than if Britain remained within the EU, equivalent to a per-household cost of £2,200; by 2030, the OECD claims that the GDP shortfall would be over 5 per cent, equating to £3,200 per household.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Will this affect voters? Polling by Ipsos Mori suggests not: two thirds of voters believe that their standard of living won’t be affected by Brexit. And worryingly for Remain, pro-EU voters were more likely to shift position in response to a threat to their standard of living, while Leave voters remained committed even when told they would personally lose out. Just 7 per cent of Leave supporters surveyed said they would vote Remain if Brexit left them £500 a year worse off.

Content from our partners
How do we secure the hybrid office?
How materials innovation can help achieve net zero and level-up the UK
Fantastic mental well-being strategies and where to find them

That means that subsequent Vote Leave attacks on the independence of the (partially EU-funded) OECD are possibly beside the point: Leave voters are unlikely to change their allegiance for financial reasons.

Nevertheless, reports from the UK Treasury, the LSE’s Centre for Economic Performance and the Confederation of British Industries have all reached similar conclusions on the economic consequences of Brexit.