Support 110 years of independent journalism.

  1. World
13 August 2014updated 21 Sep 2021 5:05am

Does the British public want to bomb ISIS?

Voters opposed action against Assad, but support strikes against ISIS. Are recent events or the phrasing of a question responsible?

By Harry Lambert

When Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 was shot down over eastern Ukraine last month, public opinion towards Russia shifted drastically.

Before the crash most voters thought the Russia-Ukraine conflict was not a matter for the UK and the West. That changed after MH17. Voters wanted to impose sanctions, freeze Russian assets in foreign countries and even expel Russia from the G8.

Something similar is now happening over Iraq. A week of atrocities have hardened our attitude towards ISIS/IS – the Islamic State that has swept across Syria and Iraq and created its own independent caliphate.

Last September, nearly twice as many voters opposed than supported the US carrying out unilateral “missile attacks against Syria”. Even more voters were glad the British avoided taking “any part in military action”.

Select and enter your email address A quick and essential guide to domestic politics from the New Statesman's Westminster team. Your new guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture each weekend - from the New Statesman. A weekly newsletter helping you understand the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email. Stay up to date with NS events, subscription offers & updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

But people have responded very differently this week. In September, unilateral US air strikes faced twice as much opposition as support. Now voters have expressed the opposite view, and a majority of them support such strikes.

Similarly, the public is split on whether the RAF should take part. 37 per cent support the idea; 36 per cent oppose it. But in September 74 per cent of voters were glad MPs voted against Cameron’s call for conflict, and just 12 per cent disapproved.

Content from our partners
How placemaking can drive productivity in cities – with PwC
The UK needs SMEs to reach net zero
To truly tackle regional disparities, we need a new type of devolution

This could be further evidence that public opinion changes when atrocities are committed and reported.

Or it may just be because of the way the question was phrased.

Last September YouGov asked a curt question that just asked about “Syria”, and assumed voters knew the threat Assad’s government posed to the region. This time they accompanied their questions by asking whether US strikes were justified “to prevent the killing of religious minorities and to protect American personnel in the region”.

By loading the question, they may have triggered a response. Most voters are probably unaware of ISIS’s actions.

When the MH17 crash was plastered over every paper and news site in the country, only a minority of voters “noticed” the story. Even fewer have registered the debate over “Iraq airstrikes”.

Data from YouGov-Cambridge shows just 26 per cent of voters have picked up on it. It may be the most noticed story of the week, and the only thing many people are talking about, but three-quarters of the electorate still appear to be oblivious to it.

This is a preview of, an affiliated site launching later this year. You can find related analyses here.