Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. UK Politics
2 March 2021updated 04 Sep 2021 8:27am

How Keir Starmer has fallen out of favour with voters

According to the Britain Elects poll tracker, more voters now rate the Labour leader negatively than positively.

By Ben Walker

Almost a year after Keir Starmer became Labour leader, it appears the shine is starting to wear off – there are now more voters who feel negative about him than who feel positive. 

As of 26 February, the Britain Elects poll tracker recorded that 33.6 per cent of voters had a positive view of Starmer, a fall of five percentage points on the start of the year. Compared to last summer, this represents a fall of between six and seven points.

After 11 months as Labour leader, Starmer drifts into net negativity
Data from the Britain Elects poll tracker

Meanwhile, the share of Britons who regard Starmer poorly now stands at 33.8 per cent, an increase of nearly two points since the start of 2021.


The rising number of Brits who disapprove of Labour’s new leader is not a new trend, and is not altogether surprising. We can partially attribute this shift in mood to the government’s successful Covid-19 vaccine rollout, which has given Boris Johnson a boost. We can also attribute some of the changes to history: politicians are almost destined to fall foul with voters. At the 2015 general election, for instance, leaders were interested in being the least unpopular, rather than the most popular. It is rare that opinion polls will record sustained, high ratings for our elected representatives. 

Starmer’s 11-month drift into negative poll ratings is not unique, therefore, and nor is it necessarily a sign of a failing strategy. To compare this trajectory with that of former party leaders: it took Ed Miliband two months to enter negative polling territory, and it took Jeremy Corbyn… well, not even a month.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy
History suggests Starmer is not a guaranteed future prime minister, but he’s not a no-hoper either
Date each leader of the opposition saw more voters regard them unfavourably than favourably

While it is by no means a perfect metric, the time it takes a leader to become unpopular with voters can reveal something about their chances of winning at the next election. Opposition leaders who eventually go on to become prime minister – or at least come close to it – normally gain and retain a sustained level of public warmth upon their initial election. For ten months straight, David Cameron managed just that.

It took Starmer almost 11 months to fall out of favour with the UK public, so it might be worth remembering that, though he is now – just – more disliked than liked (among those voters with an opinion), his position is not a hopeless one. Historically speaking, in fact, Starmer is in pretty good company.

Content from our partners
Helping children be safer, smarter, happier internet explorers
Power to the people
How to power the electric vehicle revolution

[Hear more on the New Statesman podcast]