Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. UK Politics
2 March 2021updated 04 Sep 2021 8:27am

How Keir Starmer has fallen out of favour with voters

According to the Britain Elects poll tracker, more voters now rate the Labour leader negatively than positively.

By Ben Walker

Almost a year after Keir Starmer became Labour leader, it appears the shine is starting to wear off – there are now more voters who feel negative about him than who feel positive. 

As of 26 February, the Britain Elects poll tracker recorded that 33.6 per cent of voters had a positive view of Starmer, a fall of five percentage points on the start of the year. Compared to last summer, this represents a fall of between six and seven points.

After 11 months as Labour leader, Starmer drifts into net negativity
Data from the Britain Elects poll tracker

Meanwhile, the share of Britons who regard Starmer poorly now stands at 33.8 per cent, an increase of nearly two points since the start of 2021.


The rising number of Brits who disapprove of Labour’s new leader is not a new trend, and is not altogether surprising. We can partially attribute this shift in mood to the government’s successful Covid-19 vaccine rollout, which has given Boris Johnson a boost. We can also attribute some of the changes to history: politicians are almost destined to fall foul with voters. At the 2015 general election, for instance, leaders were interested in being the least unpopular, rather than the most popular. It is rare that opinion polls will record sustained, high ratings for our elected representatives. 

Starmer’s 11-month drift into negative poll ratings is not unique, therefore, and nor is it necessarily a sign of a failing strategy. To compare this trajectory with that of former party leaders: it took Ed Miliband two months to enter negative polling territory, and it took Jeremy Corbyn… well, not even a month.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
History suggests Starmer is not a guaranteed future prime minister, but he’s not a no-hoper either
Date each leader of the opposition saw more voters regard them unfavourably than favourably

While it is by no means a perfect metric, the time it takes a leader to become unpopular with voters can reveal something about their chances of winning at the next election. Opposition leaders who eventually go on to become prime minister – or at least come close to it – normally gain and retain a sustained level of public warmth upon their initial election. For ten months straight, David Cameron managed just that.

Content from our partners
Transport is the core of levelling up
The forgotten crisis: How businesses can boost biodiversity
Small businesses can be the backbone of our national recovery

It took Starmer almost 11 months to fall out of favour with the UK public, so it might be worth remembering that, though he is now – just – more disliked than liked (among those voters with an opinion), his position is not a hopeless one. Historically speaking, in fact, Starmer is in pretty good company.

[Hear more on the New Statesman podcast]