Support 110 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Scotland
10 January 2024

The SNP has resorted to scattergun policy

Scottish ministers are disturbingly willing to announce schemes that have been shared with no one.

By Chris Deerin

In politics, as in life, you’re sometimes better off begging forgiveness than asking permission. Sometimes you simply need to do a thing and deal with the fall out afterwards.

It’s not a form of behaviour to be pursued regularly, though. A habit of doing what you want, when you want, without any consultation, can quickly, and rightly, come to be seen as simple contempt for others.

This is a habit the SNP seems to be slipping into. The Scottish government has in the past made much of its generous approach to consultation – the disastrous gender reform bill was, we were regularly told, the most consulted upon piece of legislation in Holyrood’s history.

When it suits them, though, ministers are perfectly, and disturbingly, willing to plough on with a scheme that has been shared with no one, and that gives every impression of having occurred to them about five minutes before its launch.

The council tax freeze is a good example of this. There was no warning that one was being considered until Humza Yousaf announced it in his SNP conference speech back in October. In fact, 48 hours before his speech Yousaf didn’t know he’d be announcing it either. There had been no discussion with councils, which were horrified. It hadn’t been signed off by the cabinet either, which was surprising given the weighty economic consequences of the decision.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Another example is a planned new levy on supermarkets and larger stores that sell tobacco and alcohol. This was part of Finance Secretary Shona Robison’s tax-raising budget in late December, not that you’d have known it if you’d listened to her statement. There was no mention of the levy – which could impact on jobs and investment – in the speech. It was only spotted later in the fine print of the budget documents. David Lonsdale, director of the Scottish Retail Consortium, has criticised a “worrying ad hoc and piecemeal approach” that “smacks of incoherent policymaking within government.”

Whatever your view of the policies in question, or of any special pleading on Lonsdale’s part, it’s hard to disagree with this analysis.

And there’s more. Again, this time out loud in her actual budget speech, Robison promised a “national conversation” on NHS reform. This is a big deal, and something the British Medical Association and other health organisations have been asking for with increasing desperation for many months. As they’ve watched the health service creak and fail, medics have repeatedly pushed ministers to undertake a sweeping and open-minded review of how the NHS operates.

But the announcement, when it came, amounted to no more than a single, fleeting line: “we will take forward a National Conversation to help shape the NHS for the future.” There was no advance warning to the BMA or anyone else, and I’m told there has been no contact with them since. I don’t believe the words “national conversation” have publicly passed the lips of the Health Secretary Michael Matheson, who anyway has other problems to face. Is it happening? If it does, is the government’s heart in it? Where’s the sense of urgency?

All of the above speaks, as David Lonsdale puts it, to a “worrying ad hoc and piecemeal approach” – to an administration that lacks coherence, confidence and purpose. Indeed, it’s telling that Yousaf seems happiest and most energised when unveiling yet another fantasy paper on how wonderful independence would be – £10,000 more for the average Scottish family! – prepared by civil servants who might be otherwise, and arguably more fruitfully, employed.

The Scottish electorate’s capacity for forgiveness may be wearing rather thin.

[See also: How much trouble is Ed Davey in?]

Content from our partners
What you need to know about private markets
Work isn't working: how to boost the nation's health and happiness
The dementia crisis: a call for action

Topics in this article : , ,