Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Labour
29 November 2021

Angela Rayner seeks to fix a familiar problem with her big speech on corruption

Labour’s deputy leader tried to move the party from arguing for a policy position to a policy principle.

By Stephen Bush

One of the mistakes of the first year of Keir Starmer’s leadership was a confusion between policy proposals (of which which they announced a startling and counter-productively high number) and policy principles (of which they announced essentially zero). 

What’s the difference? Well, “the two-child policy limit on child benefit should be scrapped” is a policy proposal, announced by Starmer’s Labour in 2020. “The two-child policy limit should be scrapped because no family can predict the future when they have children” is a policy principle. “The two-child limit should be scrapped because everyone should have a minimum standard of living” is another. “The two-child limit should be scrapped because childcare is a shared social responsibility that we all, childless or not, have a stake in” is a third. And, “the two-child limit should be scrapped in order to preserve the genetic purity of the white British” is yet another. 

The thing about all these policy principles is that if I tell you which one is closest to my principles, then you’ll have a pretty good chance of guessing my political positions on other issues as well. Now, you may look at that list and go, “well, I wholly agree with three of those” but, sooner or later, if we asked you enough questions, you would find that you were more of a “shared social responsibility” kind of person or more of a “no child should be punished for their parents’ mistakes” sort of person, or we might, regrettably, discover that you were a “genetic purity” kind of person. 

For anyone who wants to work out if a political party deserves their vote, looking at its principles on one issue is a pretty good guide to what it thinks about another issue. Very few people spend all that much time looking at the gritty details of each and every policy: what they instead do is look for a guide as to whether the party in question is a “shared social responsibility” party or a “genetic purity” party, before voting accordingly.

The biggest and most significant part of Angela Rayner’s speech today (29 November) to the Institute for Government was that it attempted to move from a policy announcement (Labour would strengthen and expand the role of various watchdogs to tackle corruption at Westminster) to a policy principle (that we should “all play by the rules”).

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

The latter is more important than the former because it broadens out one attack line on one particular set of stories to a broader principle. It’s useful for Labour to be able to link back its position on, for example, Universal Credit to its differences with the Conservatives on cronyism and corruption.

But the bigger problem for Labour is that across wide swathes of its policy programme, the party has consistently failed to turn announcements into broad principles: we are no closer to really having a sense of what the party is “for” in a deeper sense than we were a year ago. Keir Starmer’s big hope with his second reshuffle of 2021 will be that his leadership finally succeeds in finding a theme.

Content from our partners
How to create a responsible form of “buy now, pay later”
“Unions are helping improve conditions for drivers like me”
Transport is the core of levelling up

[See also: Keir Starmer begins a reshuffle – and picks a fight]

Topics in this article: ,