Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
13 March 2017

Why no deal with the EU isn’t better than a bad deal

The consequences of failing to reach an agreement will be economically and politically punitive.

By Stephen Bush

Remember when Britain would get a good deal because the Germans had to sell us all Mercedes? (Mercedeses? Mercedii? I digress.)

Well, that line has slipped a little bit. Now we’re told that “no deal is better than a bad deal”, and that no deal is a situation that we have to prepare for.

Seeing as the consequences of “no deal” include a 15 per cent tariff on all food coming in and out of the EU and a 36 per cent tariff on dairy, plus a hard border between Northern Ireland and the South, it’s hard to see how that can possibly be true, but there you go.

The fear among Conservative MPs who voted Remain is that when their Leave-supporting colleagues talk about the benefits of leaving without a deal, they are actually laying the groundwork for just that.

The counter-argument from most of those pushing the “no deal is better than a bad deal” line is that signaling the United Kingdom’s willingness to walk away from the table increases our leverage. And it is true that on the matter of our continuing contribution to the budget talks and our contribution to Europe-wide policing and defence, there are risks to the EU if there is no deal on the table. Although Britain’s leverage is written up in some places it does exist.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

But the difficulty is that the message that we are hoping to send is “We’re crazy enough to walk away”, but what is being heard in most European capitals is “It would be crazy to walk away”. Many international negotiations start with a dialogue of the deaf but the problem with the Article 50 process is it contains no real staging posts where both sides can realise they are talking past, rather than to, one another.

Which means that the possibility of exiting without a deal shouldn’t be ruled out.