Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
14 March 2017updated 15 Mar 2017 10:28am

The Scottish No campaign risks repeating Remain’s mistakes

The Unionist side knows it doesn't want a referendum. But it lacks a stronger message.

By Stephen Bush

One referendum ends, another begins? The Article 50 Bill has passed through Parliament and Theresa May will trigger the process at the end of the month.

But Nicola Sturgeon has thrown a spanner into the works by announcing that she will seek a second referendum on whether or not Scotland should remain part of the United Kingdom.

A lot of people are guffawing about how the 2014 vote was “once in a generation” and that the SNP would have sought a referendum re-run regardless of the circumstances. And this is true, up to a point.  They’re the Scottish National Party, the clue is in the title.

But it’s equally true that the SNP won the Scottish parliamentary elections on a platform of a referendum in the case of “material change” and while the consequences of Brexit are divisive at Westminster, I am yet to find anyone who doesn’t believe it will represent a material change to how Britain has been governed. Yes, the SNP didn’t win a majority thanks to their electoral system, but they triumphed with a bigger lead and a higher vote share than David Cameron got with his referendum promise in 2015. Thanks to the support of the pro-independence Greens, they will have the votes to get it through Holyrood.

The question is what happens then. The right to hold a referendum is reserved to Westminster, and the PM may well decline to extend that right. (There’s the added subplot that a Referendum Act has to pass through Parliament. Don’t forget that Cameron had a majority of 77 thanks to the coalition, while May has one of just 16. If she says yes to a vote, the path between that and a referendum act is thorny.)

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. Your new guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture each weekend - from the New Statesman. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

As I explain at greater length here, May is in a lose-lose situation. If she says yes, she risks going down in history as the Prime Minister who presided over the break-up of the United Kingdom, and it is a real risk.

But if she says “no”, she hands the SNP a drum to beat whenever the Brexit negotiations look to be going badly: we could be out of this mess if it wasn’t for the Tory in London keeping us back.

But what should really worry the Unionist side is that they are having a procedural argument about whether or not there should be a second referendum and wasn’t this all settled last time? The insistence that the SNP focus on the “real” issues of public services and the economy has the same familiar echo. It’s all uncomfortably close to the position of pro-Europeans in the years before 23 June 2016. There are holes in the case for independence but they have a message and a sense of who their best team is. The same really can’t be said for No.