Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Brexit
2 March 2017updated 03 Mar 2017 1:47pm

How three decades of negative press sunk the Remain campaign

A new study shows how from 1974 to 2013, coverage of the European Union was transformed. 

By Stephen Bush

Negative coverage of the European Union almost doubled between Britain’s last referendum on membership in 1975 and David Cameron’s pledge to hold a second referendum in 2013, a study has found.

Some 24 per cent of news about the European Community was negative in 1994, in contrast to 45 per cent in 2014.

The research, which analysed 16,400 newspaper articles across five periods when the European Union was highly prominent in British news, also found that the most significant shift was the collapse in positive news about the European Union, which fell from 25 per cent in 1974 to 10 per cent by 2013.

Five papers – the Daily Mail, the Financial Times, the Guardian, the Daily Mirror, and the Times – were categorised in terms of their reporting of the EU, which was classified as either positive, negative, mixed or factual.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Content from our partners
How automation can help insurers keep pace with customer demand
How automation can help telecoms companies unlock their growth potential
The pandemic has had a scarring effect on loneliness, but we can do better

Coverage was sampled in five periods: 1974-5 when the first referendum was held, 1985-6 during the negotiations and agreement of the Single European Act, which created the single market, 1991-2 during negotiations on the Maastricht Treaty, which split the Conservative Party and birthed modern Euroscepticism, 2001-2 during the Nice Treaty negotiations, and 2012-3, when David Cameron made his referendum pledge.

Paul Copeland, who co-wrote the study with Nathaniel Copsey and lectures in politics at Queen Mary University, said the most significant finding was that there were “no real defenders of the EU to be found” in 2013 as opposed to 1975, while there was a “significant increase” in negative coverage in the right-wing press. “The only counter-weight to the noisy and negative minority is factual and neutral reporting: good journalism, but not necessarily effective as a spirited public defence of the EU.”