Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
23 March 2016updated 02 Sep 2021 4:40pm

Why a good list is at the heart of successful politics

Jeremy Corbyn's leaked list shows what the leader's office is doing right, and what it's doing wrong

By John McTernan

Lists. Politics is nothing without lists. There are the ‘promises’ you try to mobilise on polling day when you Get Out The Vote (GOTV). There was that essential tool for managing Labour groups in the Eighties: dividing them into “Goodies, Baddies and Nutters”. And there’s the list that Roy Jenkins always carried with him when in the Commons of the colleagues he needed to talk to.

All lists with a purpose. That’s the point. In politics lists are a management tool. They are dynamic not static – used to mark a point in time and then to manage people from one position to another. From “undecided” to “for”, from “against” to “undecided”. Always grow your available vote.

But lists require integrity. They must be accurate and one person must hold the pen. You can’t crowd-source a conspiracy – that’s what gaining and holding power is, at base. And any good conspiracy has to be secret too.

So, we come to today’s list. The carefully drawn up one that emanates from Jeremy Corbyn’s office. Or, more precisely from the desk of his political Secretary Katy Clark. It has obviously failed one key test – it isn’t secret. Too many people clearly had copies – worse, it was probably emailed around too. One list should have one copy and one filing cabinet.

But worse than that, it is laughably inaccurate. There are many MPs put in the wrong categories. Funniest is the “Core plus” group – the 50 or so MPs rated as close to Corbyn though not in the Core group that voted for him. At a quick glance I can identify half a dozen names of people who are anything but supportive of Jeremy. I will not name them, for the protection of the guilty.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

I will observe, though, that for all things leadership critical you must employ a “hard count” – only score the committed, not the maybes. Do not believe in what you merely hope may be so.

Interestingly, it is said that the “Core” group meet weekly with Clark and Seamas Milne. And that this is often a “whinge-a-thon”. This is one of the few bits of good political management being run by the Corbyn office. You need to see your loyalists regularly.

In my time as Tony Blair’s political secretary we had the “non-embittered former ministers group”. That was as small as you might guess it would be. By the end of Tony’s time as Prime Minister the number of former ministers was larger than Labour’s majority – and most of them had miraculously discovered a political conscience. And that conscience impelled them to speak and vote against a government they had previously loyally supported. The non-embittereds were different. Loyal to the leader and accepting of the change and renewal that had seen them move on. They gave intel on the colleagues and their mood, in exchange they received briefing and “the line”.

Content from our partners
Why modelling matters: its role in future healthcare challenges
Helping children be safer, smarter, happier internet explorers
Power to the people

The problem for Corbyn is simply put. We were managing the politics eight years after Blair was elected Prime Minister not eight months after he became leader. We looked and felt beleaguered – because we were. They look and feel beleaguered because, well, they are. Support for Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell is not growing in the Parliamentary Labour Party. In the end, in politics you need to be either respected it feared – they are neither. Worse, as this leaks list shows, they are increasingly mockable. Authority ebbs gradually, but laughter is a universal solvent.