Support 110 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
17 February 2016

David Cameron’s fiscal gerrymandering would make Robert Mugabe wince

What the government is doing to cities like mine is worse than a joke, says Joe Anderson.

By Joe Anderson Joe Anderson

It’s little wonder government ministers have stopped claiming “we’re all in it together” given the scandal of the iniquitous local government relief settlement they have just announced.

Four-fifths of a new £300 million pot, earmarked to assist councils facing budget cuts, is heading straight into the coffers of Conservative county councils. There is not even any pretence at this inherent unfairness. It is what it is: brazen financial gerrymandering. It’s enough to make Robert Mugabe wince.

After all, just follow the money. The biggest beneficiary of this “transitional relief” scheme will be Surrey County Council, which will receive £24m. Hampshire gets £19m, Hertfordshire £16m, £14m goes to Essex, £12m to West Sussex, £11m to Kent and £9m to Buckinghamshire.

Notice a pattern? The Conservative shires are being showered with the Prime Minister’s largesse. Indeed, Cameron’s own county council in Oxfordshire will get an additional £9m – to ease the pressure of cuts from his own ministers.

But this generosity comes at the expense of other – more needy – parts of the country. In fact, the five most deprived councils in the land – Middlesbrough, Knowsley, Hull, Liverpool and Manchester – will receive nothing under the grant. Yet the five least deprived – Hart, Wokingham, Chiltern, Waverley, Elmbridge – will collectively receive £5.3m.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

All fair-minded people would recognise that funding for local authorities should reflect genuine need. Money should head to the hardest-hit authorities, with the biggest social and economic challenges.

Since 2011, Liverpool has lost 58 per cent of its annual budget – some £330m. But instead of helping us grow and diversify our economy and protect the most vulnerable, ministers seem more concerned about buying off their backbenchers and delighting their grassroots by looking after their own.

But it’s not just that leafy Tory towns get bought off with a political bung, they are also in a much better position to raise their own money.

Take Surrey County Council for example – a richer authority with less pressure on health, housing and adult social care services than the one I lead. The council generates £586m in council tax revenue, compared with just £130m in Liverpool. Grant cuts there don’t hit anywhere near as hard as they do to us.

There was a time when David Cameron was concerned ‘detoxifying’ the Conservatives and positioning his party on the centre-ground of British politics. Now he is content to circle his wagons around the south of England.

“All in it together?” Don’t make me laugh.

Content from our partners
<strong>What you need to know about private markets </strong>
Work isn't working: how to boost the nation's health and happiness
The dementia crisis: a call for action