After becoming the first prime minister since Lord Palmerston in 1857 to increase his party’s share of votes and seats (as he recently boasted to European leaders), David Cameron is in even more confident form than usual. Having been roundly defeated at last week’s PMQs, Harriet Harman tried a new tack today. After Cameron contemptuously dismissed her call for 16-17-year-olds to be allowed to vote in the EU referendum, Labour’s acting leader chided him for “ranting and sneering and gloating” before adding, in her best line, “Frankly, he should show a bit more class”. A suitably chastened Cameron responded with far more emollience to her next question (on the neutrality of the government during the referendum). The ease with which Labour’s headmistress disciplined the unruly pupil suggested the Tories should invite her to lead one of their free schools.
But after a civil interlude, Cameron riled Harman again when he quoted her statement that some Labour voters were “relieved” the party didn’t win. “He just can’t help himself but gloat, can he?” she said. “Go right ahead and gloat, but why shouldn’t he just answer the question about childcare … Perhaps we can have an answer instead of a gloating session.” This time, however, Cameron opted to attack rather than to appease. “I’m sorry if the Right Honourable Lady thinks I’m gloating,” he replied. “It must be the first time someone’s been accused of gloating while quoting the leader of the opposition, I mean for instance, she said the other day, ‘people tend to like a leader who they feel is economically competent’. I think she’s been talking a lot of sense and I’m going to be quoting her as often as I can!”
Harman’s tactic ensured a better performance than last week. And Cameron would be wise not to gloat – he does after all have a majority of just 12. But whether Labour should seek to interrupt its opponent when he is making a mistake is open to question. Others will argue that Harman should focus on defeating Cameron on substance, rather than tone.
On policy, it was notable that Cameron refused to rule out holding the EU referendum on the same day as next year’s Scottish and local elections (which would likely favour the In camp). Harman’s rejection of this option was aimed at the Tories’ divisions but also reflected Labour’s belief that the ballot must be seen as fair and not “rigged”. For the same reason, Harman argued that the government must not use public funds or the state machine to bolster the In campaign. Expect Labour to seek to force Cameron to capitulate to his backbenchers on this front.
Content from our partners
Related
