New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Politics
4 June 2015updated 26 Sep 2015 6:46am

“Humble and obedient”? Andy Burnham was just following protocol when writing to Prince Charles

Labour leadership candidate Andy Burnham's sign-off on a letter to Prince Charles, which he wrote while Health Secretary, may seem obsequious, but it's nothing personal.

By Media Mole

Poor Andy Burnham. The Labour leadership frontrunner has been getting an earful on twitter today over a letter he sent to Prince Charles while Health Secretary.

The postscript, in Burnham’s own handwriting, is all too easily mistaken for an act of personal obsequiousness, leaving commentators cringing.

But sharpminded readers may recall another letter from the Black Spider batch which employed remarkably similar phrasing…

Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month

Photo: Cabinet Office scan

Being a creature of some class, this mole turned to high society guide Debrett’s to confirm its suspicions – and found that the phrase is, indeed, a matter of routine protocol.

I would like to write a letter of thanks for a gift to HRH The Prince of Wales. How should the letter be addressed, and how should the letter be started and ended? 

A letter written directly to HRH The Prince of Wales (as opposed to his private secretary) would begin, ‘Sir’. The letter would close: ‘I have the honour to remain [comma, new line] Sir [comma, new line], Your Royal Highness’s most humble and obedient servant’. The envelope should be addressed to His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales.

While mocking the traditions of the royal household is a right no citizen should be denied, it seems unfair to censure Burnham just for following convention. Stand down, Twitter.

Content from our partners
Chelsea Valentine Q&A: “Embrace the learning process and develop your skills”
Apprenticeships: the road to prosperity
Apprenticeships are an impactful pathway to employment