Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
8 November 2013updated 26 Sep 2015 10:46am

Three G4S guards have been accused of forgery

A judge condemns them for being "well aware" that official documents were altered before a trial.

By Alan White

The case of “AB” vs The Home Secretary, heard at the High Court 30 October – November 1, looked like a pretty routine asylum claim (which was refused). But the judgement contains a rather surprising twist.

When AB was deported from Brook House removal centre to his home country, a removal certificate showed that “various paperwork” was packed up among his things. This certificate was later corruptly redacted, according to the judge, Justice Mostyn.

His judgement says:

“The original clean certificate was only produced by the Secretary of State following a request made by the claimant’s solicitors after the doctored certificate has been produced in evidence as exhibits to the witness statements … It is obvious that a semi-translucent piece of paper was placed over part of it when copies were made to obliterate the reference to “various paperwork” (as well as some other things of no consequence)…

I regret to have to find, but I must, that both of these witnesses were well aware that the certificate had been altered by somebody who felt that it was helpful to this defence to obliterate a reference to “various paperwork”. I am doubtful whether these witnesses were actively complicit in what was an act of forgery but I am convinced that they knew more than they were letting on to me.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

The conduct of the Secretary of State’s agents in falsifying the room clearance certificate is corrupt and truly shocking. When agents of the state falsify documents it undermines, if not fatally, then certainly very seriously, the trust of the people in the operation of the rule of law. It makes no difference if, as here, the agents are private contractors to whom the Secretary of State has outsourced her powers. Corruption by state officials is insidious and corrosive and it is the duty of the authorities where it is found to root it out ruthlessly.”

The judgement has been referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions. Following the jailing of Clive Carter, and the launch of a Serious Fraud Office inquiry into overcharging claims, could we be seeing more G4S staff up before the courts?