New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Politics
9 March 2012

A Lib Dem tax cut for the rich

Higher-earners gain the most from an increase in the personal allowance.

By George Eaton

Nick Clegg has always presented his party’s plan to raise the personal tax allowance to £10,000 (since adopted by the coalition) as a “progressive” policy. In other words, one that benefits the poor more than the rich. But unfortunately for the Lib Dem leader, the data tells a different story.

Today’s IFS analysis reminds us that the biggest winners are those at the top of the income distribution. As the graph below shows, those in the second-richest decile gain the most in cash terms, followed by the richest tenth, who gain marginally less due to the gradual removal of the personal allowance after £100,000 (a brilliant stealth tax introduced by Alistair Darling). As a percentage of income, it is middle-earners who gain the most, with those at the bottom gaining by far less.


In addition, the policy does nothing to help those who don’t earn enough to pay income tax (a third of the adult population) such as pensioners and part-time workers. These groups would, of course, gain from a temporary VAT cut (as advocated by Labour), which the IFS also argues would be a more effective fiscal stimulus than a rise in the personal allowance.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

None of this means that Clegg can’t argue that the policy has some merits. As the IFS notes, “it will strengthen work incentives, especially for low earners.” But it does mean that he can’t call it “progressive”. The rich, not the poor, are the big winners.

Content from our partners
An innovative approach to regional equity
ADHD in the criminal justice system: a case for change – with Takeda
The power of place in tackling climate change