Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Media
16 November 2010updated 27 Sep 2015 2:10am

Which vested interests are meeting with ministers?

A new website collates information on meetings held between MPs and lobbyists.

By Samira Shackle

A new website, publishing information of meetings that MPs have with lobbyists and outside interests, is now live.

Who’s Lobbying aims to present this data — which is already in the public domain, but frequently buried in difficult-to-find PDF files — in an easily accessible and searchable format.

It also includes “treemaps” — or data visualisations of how much time is spent with different organisations and their lobbyists. As the site explains:

The treemap shows about a quarter of the Department of Energy and Climate Change meetings are with power companies. Only a small fraction are with environmental or climate change organisations.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

While there are still a few issues to be straightened out, this is potentially a hugely valuable tool for journalists and campaigners alike. It will be easier to insist on an equal hearing if evidence of disproportionate time spent with one side is readily available.

Content from our partners
How automation can help telecoms companies unlock their growth potential
The pandemic has had a scarring effect on loneliness, but we can do better
Feel confident gifting tech to your children this Christmas

Moreover, one of the issues that the site faces at the moment raises important questions about the nature of the coalition’s frequently avowed commitment to transparency. This is explained in a blog on the site:

Unfortunately Number 10 and the Cabinet Office have not mandated a consistent format for publishing ministerial meeting information…

All other departments [apart from the Department for Transport] only provided the month of each meeting – was that an instruction given centrally to departments? Because of this it isn’t possible to determine if two ministers were at the same meeting. Our analysis is likely to be double counting meetings with two ministers in attendance.

Under the previous Labour government, departments had published dates for individual meetings. In this regard, are we seeing less transparency under the Conservative/Lib Dem coalition?

It’s possible — as the blog points out — that this is the result of “teething problems” as the government’s transparency agenda is implemented. If this is the case, this new tool will apply pressure by scrutinising these processes. If not, it could be used to draw attention to a serious hole in transparency procedures.