Support 110 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Media
16 November 2010updated 27 Sep 2015 2:10am

Which vested interests are meeting with ministers?

A new website collates information on meetings held between MPs and lobbyists.

By Samira Shackle

A new website, publishing information of meetings that MPs have with lobbyists and outside interests, is now live.

Who’s Lobbying aims to present this data — which is already in the public domain, but frequently buried in difficult-to-find PDF files — in an easily accessible and searchable format.

It also includes “treemaps” — or data visualisations of how much time is spent with different organisations and their lobbyists. As the site explains:

The treemap shows about a quarter of the Department of Energy and Climate Change meetings are with power companies. Only a small fraction are with environmental or climate change organisations.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

While there are still a few issues to be straightened out, this is potentially a hugely valuable tool for journalists and campaigners alike. It will be easier to insist on an equal hearing if evidence of disproportionate time spent with one side is readily available.

Moreover, one of the issues that the site faces at the moment raises important questions about the nature of the coalition’s frequently avowed commitment to transparency. This is explained in a blog on the site:

Unfortunately Number 10 and the Cabinet Office have not mandated a consistent format for publishing ministerial meeting information…

All other departments [apart from the Department for Transport] only provided the month of each meeting – was that an instruction given centrally to departments? Because of this it isn’t possible to determine if two ministers were at the same meeting. Our analysis is likely to be double counting meetings with two ministers in attendance.

Under the previous Labour government, departments had published dates for individual meetings. In this regard, are we seeing less transparency under the Conservative/Lib Dem coalition?

It’s possible — as the blog points out — that this is the result of “teething problems” as the government’s transparency agenda is implemented. If this is the case, this new tool will apply pressure by scrutinising these processes. If not, it could be used to draw attention to a serious hole in transparency procedures.

Content from our partners
What you need to know about private markets
Work isn't working: how to boost the nation's health and happiness
The dementia crisis: a call for action