Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
8 September 2010updated 27 Sep 2015 2:14am

For Tony Blair and free speech

Are we censoring a retired politician?

By David Allen Green

A retired politician is promoting a publication to those who may wish to purchase it.

This is not some extremist politician, but a former mainstream, democratic politician.

And this is not just any former mainstream, democratic politician, but the only UK party leader to have won a decisive general election with a sustainable majority since 1987.

But that politician cannot do any events. The events are being cancelled. Is this a cause for concern?

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

Padraig Reidy thinks so. Reidy is the news editor for Index on Censorship and is establishing himself as one of the most thoughtful and intellectually consistent commentators on questions of free expression.

He argues that the scenario raises censorship concerns, even though the politician in question is Tony Blair.

This surely must be correct, if the situation is approached from a principle-based approach. The defence of free expression is often most important when the beneficiary is unpopular.

So, if this is a case where free expression is being threatened, should all people of goodwill now shout out: “For Tony Blair and Free Speech”?

David Allen Green is a lawyer and writer. His Jack of Kent blog was shortlisted for the Orwell Prize in 2010. He will now be blogging regularly for the New Statesman on legal and policy matters.