Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
13 September 2010

Queen’s Speech cancelled. An abuse of power?

Coalition cancels 2011 Queen's Speech. Is this more than a matter of political convenience?

By George Eaton

The Queen can look forward to an extended holiday next spring: the coalition has cancelled her annual address to Parliament. The government claims that the decision is part of its plan to permanently move the the state opening of parliament from the autumn to the spring, meaning the next Queen’s Speech won’t be until 2012.

Here’s Sir George Young’s explanation:

[T]he government believes that it would be appropriate to move towards five 12-month sessions over a parliament, beginning and ending in the spring. This has the advantage of avoiding a final fifth session [beginning in the autumn] of only a few months, which restricts the ability of parliament to consider a full legislative programme.

But it’s far from clear why the next Queen’s Speech couldn’t be held in May 2011 (the last was held on 25 May) and Labour MPs smell a rat.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

As Rosie Winterton, the shadow leader of the Commons, pointed out on the World at One:

Normally, a government has 12 months, maximum 18 months to get its legislation through. What the government has said is that, because we had got a difficult session ahead, we want two years to get our legislation through … it’s an abuse of power and parliament.

Meanwhile, Speaker Bercow has ordered Young to answer an urgent question from Labour MP Denis MacShane on the subject this afternoon. As in the case of the 55 per cent rule and the proposed boundary changes, it’s hard to avoid the sense that this is another example of Cameron introducing political reform with little or no consultation. And given the divisive nature of much of the coalition’s legislative programme, ministers have some way to go to convince Parliament that this is more than a matter of political convenience.