Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
19 September 2010updated 27 Sep 2015 2:12am

Is “sorrow” enough?

Why the Pope’s language about abuse victims was insufficient.

By Sophie Elmhirst

The Pope’s visit, covered in minute-by-minute detail by the nation’s media, is drawing to its close. Today is the final day, and the pontiff is in Birmingham, conducting the beatification of Cardinal Newman in front of a crowd of thousands in Cofton Park.

However, it was his statements yesterday on the child abuse cases within the Catholic Church at a Mass in Westminster Cathedral that attracted the closest attention:

Above all, I express my deep sorrow to the innocent victims of these unspeakable crimes, along with my hope that the power of Christ’s grace, his sacrifice of reconciliation, will bring deep healing and peace to their lives.

To those representing abuse victims, the carefully shaped rhetoric was hardly sufficient. As Peter Isely, of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, said: “We don’t need a Pope who is sad about crimes. We need a Pope who will prevent crimes. And his words prevent nothing.”

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

But what carefully chosen words they are. “Sorrow”, as Isely points out, implies sadness, possibly regret, but it does not constitute an apology, let alone an acknowledgement of wider responsibility or failure within the Church.

Notably absent, also, was a sense of action being taken to prevent further abuses. Peter Saunders, chief executive of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood, and a victim of abuse himself, called on the Pope to provide funding to abuse survivors and open up access to Vatican files.

Later in the day, it emerged that the Pope had met five British victims of sexual abuse, and had told them the Church was working “to bring to justice clergy and religious [people] accused of these egregious crimes” as well as striving to “implement effective measures designed to safeguard young people”.

This will no doubt be welcome to those campaigning for greater protection of young people in the Church, and support for those who have been victim to abuse. But a true public apology, and an acknowledgement of deep failings within the system, still feel noticeably missing from this papal visit.