Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
12 October 2009

Blind Gordon

Why the fuss over the Prime Minister's sight?

By Mehdi Hasan

I was on LBC radio this morning with Nick Ferrari, discussing the Prime Minister’s vision in the wake of reports that Gordon Brown’s right eye has suffered retinal damage. I have to agree with the Work and Pensions Secretary, Yvette Cooper, on this story: “I do sometimes wonder what all the fuss is about.”

Don’t get me wrong. I am not a blind (forgive the phrase!) Brown supporter or loyalist. There are countless criticisms that could and should be levelled at this prime minister — from his prosecution of the misbegotten war in Afghanistan to his timidity with financial and economic reform to his stubborn refusal to countenance a game-changing referendum on proportional representation this side of a general election.

So why the persistent and ludicrous focus on his “health” and, in particular, his “sight”? There is no evidence whatsoever that he is losing the sight in his right eye and, even if he is, why it should matter? Must the Prime Minister of Great Britain have 20:20 vision? Is that part of our unwritten constitution? Or is it simply not possible for a blind man to be the nation’s leader?

This last question was put repeatedly to me by Nick Ferrari, who referred to “fears” surrounding the PM’s vision. The only fears, however, are personal, not political. David Blunkett showed us that it is perfectly possible for a blind man to hold one of the highest offices in the land — home secretary — and David Paterson has been an able replacement for Eliot Spitzer as governor of New York, despite losing his sight as a child. Blunkett was even touted as a future prime minister and Labour leader.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

There is, however, a bigger issue. It is the idea that Brown will use his “health” as an excuse to stand down before next year’s election and make way for another Labour leader (Johnson? Miliband?) to take the fight to Cameron’s Conservatives. It is a view attributed to, among others, Tony Blair in Adam Boulton’s book Tony’s Ten Years. If Brown does go down this route — and, again, there is no real evidence whatsoever that he plans to do so — it will undermine and curtail the hopes and aspirations of millions of disabled people in this country, for whom the nation’s top job will suddenly seem off-limits. There’s more than party politics at stake here.

Content from our partners
How do we secure the hybrid office?
How materials innovation can help achieve net zero and level-up the UK
Fantastic mental well-being strategies and where to find them