The Channel 4 documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle has been fuelling debate on blogs all week. George Monbiot said: “The less true a programme is, the greater the controversy.” And this has certainly caused controversy.
Scientists at RealClimate say they are attempting to correct the factual inaccuracies of the programme.
Carl Wunsch, a renowned oceanographer, said he was misrepresented by C4 and has clarified his views on this blog. But plenty of people including UrbanGrounds were excited by the programme.Ellee Seymour is asking: Who swindled who?
The House of Commons vote in favour of not delaying the replacement of the Trident nuclear programme, was highlighted by Barry’s Beef.
Over at Nether-world, Davide Simonetti harked back to 1982 when Labour announced: “Labour is the only party pledged to end the nuclear madness.” He also noted Peter Hain speaking in 1983 saying: “The more direct action there is against nuclear weapons in Britain, the greater the freedom a Labour government will have to get rid of them.”
As the smoking ban will be enforced in two weeks in Wales and in the summer in England, it is appropriate how the Croydonian
suggested the Dutch Health Minister Ab Klink’s plan to ban smoking in the Netherlands’ coffee shops is slightly bizarre. According to the Croydonian, one Dutch MP noted that this: “would be the same as banning alcohol in pubs”. The ruling coalition lost the vote in the Netherlands on Wednesday.
And bloggers were again in the news this week when advertising guru Martin Sorrell said he was portrayed as a “wise-guy” when a blogger posted opinions about him. He was speaking at his High Court libel trial. We do not condone this behaviour from bloggers. How dare they express their opinion.
Content from our partners
Related
Join the debate
Subscribe here to comment