New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Long reads
5 May 2011updated 18 Aug 2014 4:39pm

Afghanistan — a heavy legacy for Generation Xbox

Max Benitz plunges into life with a company of Scots Guards on the front line in Helmand Province. 

By Max Benitz

Spring arrives for each of us in different ways: the realisation that it is still light at six in the evening, birdsong, a freshening of the air.

For the British army, spring means changing the guard in Helmand. One brigade leaves and another arrives. The men on their way out have faced the damp and danger of a winter tour. Those arriving know that they are in for the summer “fighting season”, against a tough and innovative insurgency.

A year ago, I joined the 1st Battalion Scots Guards, who were making their way to RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire for the flight to war. At Camp Bastion, the main British base in Afghanistan, they noted the contrast between their own pristine desert combats and the stained clothing of the men heading home.

I had been given permission to spend time reporting on the Scots Guards, a regiment that dates back to the 17th century, and I was elated. My father, Bryan, had served with the regiment and I had grown up in a house decorated with prints of pipers and guardsmen. The war in Afghanistan, which began when some of the guardsmen serving today were just nine years old, fascinated me. This generation, so frequently written off as feckless, Xbox-addled and more likely to urinate on war memorials than pay homage to them, was going to Helmand. I wanted in.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Barred by constitution and temperament from being a soldier, I decided to go to war as a witness. A subtle distinction from going as a journalist – I had no news editor barking for headlines. I was allowed the time to dwell among the men of the Scots Guards and write a book about them in return. What I saw was the best of this generation going through an experience that was unique to them, though redolent of what their forefathers had done.

There’s not a lot of God talked by Britain’s Armed Forces but there is ancestor worship. Guardsman Glen Murray, a South African, put it well one night in Helmand: “What we’re doing out here, it’s the closest [thing] our generation will have to the Second World War. When I get home, I’m going to wear my campaign medal every day. People in South Africa, they might not know what it means, but I will and my family will. I’m going to wear it every day.”

These young soldiers are fighting a war that was caused by mistakes that the generation before them made. You gave these guardsmen the Afghanistan war. This is what they did last summer. This is what the men heading out this spring will contend with.

“Was that a petrol bomb?”

“Hang on – rewind and freeze it.”

The lance corporal paused the feed from the CCTV camera monitoring a primitive road through this dusty patch of Helmand. As an armoured personnel carrier chugged along, part of a routine convoy, a flying object from behind a wall described a lazy arc towards it. In the next frame, a cloud of grainy flame leaped over the vehicle. “Little fuckers. It is. What do I put up on the net?”

On the radio network, news of the petrol bomb – harmless though it turned out to be – flew up the chain of command. Brigadier Richard Felton himself expressed interest in it at that evening’s conference between battle groups in Lashkar Gah, capital of the southern Afghan province of Helmand.

The petrol bomb marked something new. British soldiers are generally more worried by roadside bombs, known as “improvised explosive devices” or IEDs. Yet it fitted with an emer­ging pattern. Quite a few of the brigadier’s men had been (relatively) lucky in the early months of the year, treading on IEDs that failed to detonate fully. The theory was that the insurgents were running out of bomb-making materials.

There was hope that this meant UK and US troops were finally making progress in Afghan­istan but cynics said that it might also be related to floods in Pakistan disrupting insurgent supply routes across the border. The truth was more complicated – another part of the shifting story of our long and often unhappy involvement in the country.

By the time of the petrol bomb in August 2010, I had been in Helmand for two months. It was a tumultuous summer. At night, from a high spot in the province, you could look south-east towards Pakistan, with its huge pillars of lightning, and dream of cool rains rather than relentless heat. Then you would dismiss the idea – rain would turn bases into quagmires and ground the army’s helicopters. No helicopters would mean no casualty evacuation, less fire support, no mail and no way out. On balance, the heat was preferable.

Digging in

Left Flank, a rifle company of 141 men from the 1st Battalion Scots Guards, arrived in Helmand in March 2010. Almost until the moment the soldiers left their families in Catterick, North Yorkshire, there was confusion over where they would be sent. Eventually they ended up a few kilometres north of Lashkar Gah.

Though Britain decided in 2005 to concentrate its troops on a triangle of land between Camp Bastion, Lashkar Gah and the smaller town of Gereshk, the area that Left Flank moved into within the triangle was still near-virgin territory to the allies in 2010.

Troops were sent there because the region’s governor, Gulab Mangal, had asked the British to help increase freedom of movement between Lashkar Gah and Gereshk. To do so, they needed to create a string of checkpoints along the road between the towns. Once the route was safe, engineers could move in and turn it from a dirt track into something more modern. Not exactly tarmac, but at least closer to level.

Rebuilding a road may not sound very strategically important in the context of a country with as many problems as Afghanistan but it is vital. Due to restricted movement, locals can’t get to the market and their children can’t get to school. A decent road also makes it easier for the allies to “link up”, simplifying logistics and taking pressure off helicopters.

Left Flank was given a seven-kilometre stretch to hold. Its success would rely on winning the support of local people. Most of these were farmers with little or no education, from a broad range of tribal backgrounds, and they had received little by way of leadership from the Afghans since the fall of the Taliban in 2001. The area was also a known insurgent base.

In early April, within days of arriving, Left Flank took its first casualties. A foot patrol along a road hit an IED, depriving the lance sergeant who triggered the bomb of two legs and an arm and causing severe head injuries to the colour sergeant (a non-commissioned officer) behind him. Their lives were saved by first aid from three very young guardsmen, who were on one of their first days in a war zone.

It was clear to Left Flank’s commander, Major Rupert Kitching, that the road would have to be cleared, inch by inch, by specialist teams. The question was how to ensure that it would remain IED-free afterwards.

In May, he decided to put in a new checkpoint on the road’s “choke point” to monitor it, and perhaps establish a “protected community” there. The creation of such communities, according to military doctrine, acts like an ink spot on a piece of blotting paper, gradually spreading the message of security and governance and drawing farmers on to the Afghan government’s side. The theory had worked elsewhere in Helmand, although usually after a bloody fight with insurgents.

Starting on 3 May, it took nine days to clear just 2.5 kilometres of road. Once the people living around the new checkpoint got their homes back, others began to be brought onside with a key tool – money. In four months, Left Flank spent approximately $70,000 of its budget (or roughly $10 per metre of road that it had to keep clear) on projects for the locals.

The company was in a “new” area so it could not hope, at first, to put in set-piece projects such as schools. Instead, it tried to get the farmers’ goodwill by digging wells and improving irrigation systems. British officers have a term for the support they and the Afghan government can give to people – the “offer”. First comes security and, once this is established, the provision of basic services – health clinics, schools, agricultural projects – follows.

But how to keep the road secure while the offer was completed? Kitching decided to put further checkpoints along the road, with a hand­ful of guardsmen alongside numerous Afghan soldiers or policemen in each. This was a risky and largely untested idea.

In the early years of the war, large numbers of Afghan forces had been “mentored” by relatively small groups of British soldiers, but this idea had been dropped in favour of more even ratios by the time Left Flank reached Helmand.

With only so many men available to him, Kitching had to take the risk that these small bases could fend for themselves in order to keep a mobile reserve to continue foot patrols – the key to getting to know the people and dominating the area. He had to take the risk that his men would get on with their Afghan partners in cramped quarters over long periods. The ratios that Left Flank lived with were an extreme version of the new orthodoxy of having high ratios of guardsmen to locals at each place, especially once casualties and R&R – a fortnight of rest and relaxation at home in Britain – took men away from the fight.

Presented with ten static targets, the insurgents responded with persistent attacks on the checkpoints. Sometimes it would be a single shooter with an AK-47, which the troops largely took in their stride. A more worrying scenario was a group of gunmen, with several using the noise of their clumsy automatic fire to mask the direction of accurate shots from a rifle.

When things were quiet, though, life at the checkpoints could be grindingly dull. There was little to do during the heat of the day apart from smoke cigarettes and drink water. As the temperature cooled, the men took turns in the open-air gym.

I once watched a sergeant named Tony Gibson sitting at Checkpoint Said Abdul in Helmand in 40-degree heat playing Call of Duty, the ultra-realistic video game that is partly set in Afghanistan. You might imagine that, as a platoon sergeant on the front line, the last thing you would want to do in your precious time off was revisit the country in virtual form. But the game is astonishingly popular.

Meals were a welcome distraction. Often the guards took turns to cook for each other. They were on ten-man ration packs; once the three-foot-long cardboard boxes were opened and the range of basic ingredients assessed, it was the chef’s choice every night. The contents varied from pack to pack – some were stuffed with tins of chicken supreme, others with boil-in-the-bag packs of minced beef.

Everyone had their speciality: deep-fried sausages and Spam fritters brought a taste of a Scottish chip shop one night, or there would be Thai noodles or Fijian curries (reflecting the multi-ethnic make-up of the modern British army) on another. The Afghans chipped in with home-made bread and, on special occasions, lamb stew.

It was notable that at night the guards would sit talking about The Inbetweeners rather than geopolitics. If a “whys and wherefores” discussion did crop up – and it rarely did, because retaining a sense of normality is more important than politics – there was an anecdotal division in opinion. Lads from Glasgow broadly thought the war was about drugs, boys from Blackburn broadly thought it was about terrorism. Like anyone else, guardsmen relate their present predicament to their previous experience.

There was some respite. “Operation World Cup” aimed to get TV sets into every checkpoint by kick-off in the Rainbow Nation last summer. The many Scottish soldiers were delighted with England’s poor performance. (When David Cam­eron, newly elected as Prime Minister, arrived in Lashkar Gah on 10 June, he sought out a group of Scots Guardsmen. “And what would you say is your greatest fear over here?” he asked earnestly. “Well, sir, I’d have to say England winning the World Cup,” replied one Lance Corporal John-Paul Barnes.)

The odd sort of freedom felt in the checkpoints is hard to express. You’re trapped in a small fortified position, sleeping head to toe, and you have no choice but to get on with it. Yet this lack of choice liberates.

There are no worries about renewing your car insurance or the weekly shop – nearly every decision is made for you. There’s the obvious worry about death or injury, but as one senior non-commissioned officer explained to me: “Afghanistan’s one of those places where it doesn’t matter how safe a place you’re in, if you’re going to get shot it doesn’t matter if you’re in Bastion or wherever – it will happen.”

When guardsmen rotated back to the comparative luxury of Left Flank’s headquarters in a larger checkpoint (showers, gas cooker, cold drinking water) many pined for the counterfeit domesticity of the little prisons up the road they had turned into homes.

Returning to a main base held other risks for men used to surviving on long-life rations. “I went down to Lashkar Gah yesterday and had, like, normal food. I was fucking violently sick this morning because I’m not used to it,” Lance Sergeant Steve Wood told me. “Milk, too. We’re used to drinking whitener. I don’t like milk any more: I like whitener.”


In the summer of 2010, the insurgents tried to, in the military jargon, “separate the people from the offer”. Sometimes this took the form of intimidation – beatings, snap-taxation of food and cash – to demonstrate insecurity. On other occasions, the insurgents would offer a history lesson to the villagers, which was eventually relayed on to the soldiers.

It went like this: in the days of the shah, Helmand’s land was parcelled out to rich land-owners whose ownership was registered with the government. Then the godless communists invaded in 1979 and there was jihad and chaos. Many people were killed and others fled their land. During the Soviet occupation and the civil war that followed in the 1980s, others settled on these lands and remain there today. (The insurgents glossed over how those who had remained throughout were made to eat their land registry documents and ID cards by the Taliban in the 1990s.)

Now a new Afghan government, this time supported by the infidel sons of Obama, was trying to establish control again. These people, the insurgents would tell the farmers, will take the land of anyone without documentation and also stop you growing poppy.

It was a powerful message in some communities. Others ignored it, and some actively helped the British by, for instance, flashing a torch just before a night-time shoot on a checkpoint began. The attacks still intensified, especially after the poppy harvest.

Then, on 12 July – while I was back in Britain for a short break – came a series of bombings, starting with an insurgent attack that mistakenly blew up a minibus full of civilians travelling behind a British vehicle. The experience of dealing with the aftermath was so traumatic that two young guardsmen had to be flown back to Britain; they bear scars that can’t be seen. The bomber killed seven Afghans and his colleagues shot at the rescue helicopter.

A week later, a Viking armoured vehicle hit another IED on the same spot, although this time the detonation caused only minor injuries. When specialists came to clear this new choke point, the insurgents struck again. A guardsman was shot in the face, then the commander of the Viking that came to rescue him was shot dead. The gunner of a Scots Guards vehicle sent to retrieve the casualties was killed by the same sniper. (Both servicemen won posthumous Military Crosses for their bravery.)

As more soldiers tried to help the wounded get away, one took a ricochet to the helmet. He dusted himself off, continued firing – and then was shot in the abdomen.

After the casualties were evacuated, their commanding officer, Lieutenant Colonel Lincoln Jopp MC, went to Camp Bastion to see them repatriated. The first guardsman to be hit couldn’t speak; his jaw was shot through. Instead, he gave Jopp a note. It read: “I don’t want to go back to UK. I want to go back to Left Flank.”

Taken together, these incidents were a clear threat to “the offer”. The response was robust. Reinforcements arrived to strike into insurgent-held areas and pushed troop numbers in the area to 450. This would give Left Flank space to concentrate on protected communities. Additional manpower and cutting-edge resources flooded in.

Left Flank then set about reshaping the area. To provide security on the road, it would now have to watch each metre, so more walls were pulled down. Local people were paid to cut down trees to deny snipers and IED planters any cover. But every action, however well intentioned, has a consequence, and the “claims clinic” that Left Flank organised was overrun with farmers demanding compensation for the destruction of their property.

Larger claims had to be settled in Lashkar Gah, but the trip there was hazardous and – at $2 – expensive. On arrival, the farmers would be asked for ID and documentation that proved land ownership. Sometimes, if any documents were missing, an “arrangement” could be made with an official – but would the cost of the arrangement be larger than the claim? And maybe the insurgents were right about this new government wanting the land? To subsistence farmers these concerns added up, and they examined the offer again.

“Was that a petrol bomb?”

“Hang on – rewind and freeze it.”

What happened on that day? Was it a disgruntled local men showing his frustration with the offer? Or was it a young boy, paid a few dollars by the insurgents to have a go? In some ways it doesn’t matter. The petrol bomb was just one incident of the hundreds that one rifle company had to deal with on one tour among many in a long campaign.

Left Flank suffered another fatality before it came home in October; a hugely popular sergeant was shot while trying, like the others, to protect comrades. But despite further IEDs, the road remains more open than closed.

Major Kitching had always told his men that they wouldn’t solve every problem in the area during their six-month tour. Instead, success or failure would be measured by the state they left the place in – for the locals, for their Afghan partners and for the next set of troops.
Reports show that, in the six months since then, Left Flank’s successes have been built on – a police precinct and government outreach office has opened, wheat seed and fertiliser were distributed to farmers to sweeten the offer further, and the security situation has improved so markedly that checkpoints are closing even as the road upgrade reaches completion.

The area Left Flank held for half a year was a previously ungoverned space, one of many in Helmand. The plan is that company will succeed company and brigade will succeed brigade until Helmand – and beyond – is ready to move to complete Afghan control. It’s uncomfortable for the soldiers to think that this will only happen in the wake of a political settlement that will almost certainly include at least some of the men who fought against them last year.

Major combat operations are slated to come to a close in 2014, after full transition to Afghan control – though timelines in wars don’t work. In terms of resources, however, the 10,000 or so British troops stationed in Afghanistan today and the billions of pounds spent annually on the mission must represent the high-water mark of this country’s involvement. In the summer of 2010 that involvement was working – at least where I witnessed it – admittedly at significant cost.

Sitting on an IED cordon one day, I saw an experienced lance sergeant look at one of the guardsmen in his care as if for the first time. “Young Ritchie Carr from Durham. Eighteen years old and you’ve already done an Afghan [tour of duty]. What have you got planned for the rest of your life?” he asked.

“Guess I’ll just keep coming back here,” said the guardsman.

Max Benitz’s book, “Six Months Without Sundays: the Scots Guards in Afghanistan”, will be published by Birlinn later this year

Content from our partners
Peatlands are nature's unsung climate warriors
How the apprenticeship levy helps small businesses to transform their workforce
How to reform the apprenticeship levy