New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Long reads
5 June 2006

Big brother no more

Syria - As repressive abroad as it is at home, its bullying tactics have done little to endear it to

By Hazem Saghieh

To its smaller neighbours, Syria is the regional bully of the Middle East. When the Palestinians seem lax in demanding their rights from Israel, it is swift to urge them on; when the Lebanese and Jordanians appeared to give way to the west over Israel, Syria pulled them up short. For the past 40 years, the country has been locked in a struggle to “return” Lebanon, Jordan and Palestine to the Syrian “womb” from which they were forcibly delivered by colonial doctors.

As with many bullies, however, Syria’s aggression stems from a nagging sense of its own weakness. Until Hafez al-Assad came to power in 1970, Syria frequently seemed keen to deny its identity as an independent nation state. In 1958, it accepted unification with Egypt under the pan-Arabist Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser and became, until 1961, simply the “northern region of the United Arab Republic”. When this venture collapsed, it briefly became the “Syrian Arab Republic” (as it is now), but after the Ba’ath Party seized power in 1963 Syria was again demoted – in official rhetoric at least – to the status of a mere qutr or “region” of a wider, and completely imaginary, Arab nation.

Under the Ba’athists, Syria has often seemed a tool of notional pan-Arabism rather than a modern state: it has always spoken far more of its resistance, defiance and steadfastness than it has of its education system, health service or economic productivity. After Hafez al-Assad came to power, Syrians began referring to their country as “the Syria of al-Assad”. Even then, their sense of nationhood was defined in terms of their leader rather than the people, or even their territory.

Syria’s fluid sense of its own borders has made relations with its tiny coastal neighbour Lebanon particularly fraught. When the two states first came into existence, Damascus refused to exchange diplomatic representation with Beirut, as it was unnecessary between “brothers” – a sign less of fraternal affection than of the need to keep a grip on Lebanese sovereignty.

The neighbours have been further divided by their attitudes to the west – to the Lebanese, progress meant copying the west: to the Syrians, progress meant fighting against it. The Lebanese emphasise the “industrial” international links they have forged through trade, education and emigration, while Syrians prefer to stress the “natural” inherited ties of language, history, land and tribe. Their identity remains deeply rooted in the Arab world.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

The Syrian one-party system is an extension of this desire for unity and for the expression of a single “national truth”, which applies equally to internal policy. It would be hard to guess from official rhetoric that “the Arab people of Syria” in fact consists of various sects whose relations are less than cordial. Outbreaks of unrest, such as the violent Kurdish demonstrations of 2004, are quelled as quickly as possible. At an international level, Syria’s authoritarian approach has proved to be less than endearing. If the Middle East is to shake off the resentment caused by 20th-century pan-Arabism, it is up to Syria to become, instead of a dictatorial “elder brother”, a good sovereign neighbour.

Hazem Saghieh is political editor of al-Hayat newspaper

Content from our partners
An innovative approach to regional equity
ADHD in the criminal justice system: a case for change – with Takeda
The power of place in tackling climate change