View all newsletters
Sign up to our newsletters

Support 110 years of independent journalism.

  1. Long reads
10 October 2005updated 24 Sep 2015 11:31am

I’m paid too much: a doctor writes

By Mark Jopling

I am one of the least qualified, least skilled and lowliest paid doctors in my hospital. My days are spent searching for missing heaps of patient notes, running errands and chasing up blood test results. I am a “junior house officer”, a useful but dispensable cog in a vast machine. Despite my humble position, I am paid a whopping £37,000 a year.

If I became a consultant, the taxpayer would be sending me home with about £90,000. Were I to prefer a nine-to-five job as a GP, I would be raking in a fat £100,000 – even more, if I played the system well. The overstretched NHS budget sets aside enough cash to ensure that the doctors’ car park is packed with luxury motors, and that we can leave the chaotic communities which throng our hospital for big houses in the charming villages and estates out of town.

We are quick to justify our pay with a battery of compelling arguments: we work hard (I know that from experience); we have big responsibilities (I know that from watching my seniors); we are also well qualified and have to endure a protracted training, both at university and on the job. Teachers, social workers and other professionals in the public sector work long hours, too, however, some of these at home and unrecognised. While people’s lives don’t depend upon their decisions, life opportunities and security do. It is unfair that our salaries dwarf theirs.

In medicine there has been a long-standing acknowledgement that nurses work hard and are underpaid. A nurse starts on a relatively modest £16,000, and regularly works nights and weekends. It is usually nurses who give patients most support during their stressful stay in hospital. If a nurse reaches the very top and becomes a nurse consultant, he or she will just about earn what I do now. This pay inequality does nothing to ease our occasionally stormy relationship. The unseen, grey-clad auxiliary staff who work so hard to keep the wards clean receive piffling sums. Doctors have succeeded masterfully in condemning such meanness while never questioning the justice of their own salaries.

Amazingly, no one objects to our pay, but then we hide the numbers so well behind a tangle of pay bands and percentages that it is unlikely that anyone really knows the scale of the opulence. And who is going to criticise the pay of such awesome life-savers?

Writing this will certainly earn me a few enemies: doctors enjoy the money they earn and most feel that it is well deserved. They will not appreciate anyone suggesting that their salaries are on a scale that is unjustified, or that it reflects badly upon their motives for joining their profession. To our shame, there has not been so much as a whisper in the medical press questioning the generosity of salaries, only a clamouring for more money.

Could doctors’ pay be redistributed to the more stingily paid members of the health professions and other public sector workers to reflect workload, training and responsibility, rather than assumed social standing? Bringing some pay equality into the public sector would thrill those who rightly feel underappreciated. Maybe money freed could go towards more drugs, machines or nurses. There are never enough. (Last week our ward closed due to a shortage of nurses. The doctors and beds sat idle.)

Alternatively, that extra money could be used to address the social deprivations that the medical profession knows are the cause of so much ill-health.

Some doctors would certainly rebel, throw down their scalpels, ditch their stethoscopes or fling their couches from the window. They would go private, go to Australia and go loudly. But when the dust settled, we would be left with the doctors whose motivation is caring for their patients, and there are many of those. The vacancies created would be filled from the queues of doctors who are on the dole and, later, by the hordes of clever sixth-formers desperate to enter medical school.

Doctors often compare their salaries to those for high-flyers in the private sector. This is irrelevant: we are state-funded service providers, and salaries that befitted this role would be more appropriate than the present excess. We do work hard for our patients, but we could serve them even better if we stepped off the golden pedestal where we have allowed ourselves to be placed.

Mark Jopling is on the staff of a hospital in Nottingham

Content from our partners
Inside the UK's enduring love for chocolate
Unlocking the potential of a national asset, St Pancras International
Time for Labour to turn the tide on children’s health

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com Our Thursday ideas newsletter, delving into philosophy, criticism, and intellectual history. The best way to sign up for The Salvo is via thesalvo.substack.com Stay up to date with NS events, subscription offers & updates. Weekly analysis of the shift to a new economy from the New Statesman's Spotlight on Policy team. The best way to sign up for The Green Transition is via spotlightonpolicy.substack.com
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU