New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Culture
18 August 2009updated 27 Sep 2015 4:07am

Foucault v Rikers Island

Discipline and Punish debunked

By Seher Hussain

Is the New York prison Rikers Island the perfect testing ground for Michel Foucault’s critiques of incarceration? The City Journal believes so, and investigates whether the celebrated French philosopher’s ideas stand up to the razor-wired reality of 14,000 inmates.
Foucault argued that visual surveillance stole a prisoner’s autonomy and crushed his soul. The City Journal discovers that, actually, direct supervision is a necessary technique in controlling the chaos and corruption of a large-scale jail. Oppressive or obligatory – you decide.

For more of a Foucault fix, see his debate with Noam Chomsky (below). And read Matthew Taunton’s piece for the NS on the perils of surveillance.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

Content from our partners
The UK’s skills shortfall is undermining growth
<strong>What kind of tax reforms would stimulate growth?</strong>
How to end the poverty premium