Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Business
  2. Economics
9 June 2021

Leader: Making Big Tech pay

The minimum global corporate tax rate shows the power elected governments can wield against multinational corporations. 

By New Statesman

For decades, multinational corporations have made a mockery of elected governments. By shifting their profits to low-tax jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands, Singapore and Ireland, they have deprived treasuries of billions in revenue. In 2016 – the most recent year for which reliable data is ­available – the largest US multinationals, including Apple, Google and ­Microsoft, offshored $1.4trn in this  manner ­(almost 2 per cent of global GDP). 

Such financial chicanery encouraged a race to the bottom among countries which competed to offer ever-lower tax rates. In 1985 the average global corporation tax rate was 49 per cent, but it is now just 24 per cent. In the UK, corporation tax was cut from 28 per cent in 2010 to 19 per cent in 2017.  Until recently, the assumption was that taxes would only fall, not rise. In 2016, while he was still chancellor, George Osborne declared his ambition to reduce corporation tax to below 15 per cent. As US president, Donald Trump cut his country’s headline rate from 35 per cent to 21 per cent. In a new era of globalisation, it was said, traditional tax policy was obsolete.

But nation-states have finally grasped a hidden truth: as a collective they still wield formidable power. The landmark agreement by G7 finance ministers on 5 June to introduce a minimum global corporate tax rate was proof of this. ­Governments have always had the means to impose such a policy; what was lacking was the political will. Joe Biden, a daringly interventionist US president, has supplied it. 

The tax agreement is an imperfect one. A corporate rate of “at least 15 per cent” falls far short of Mr Biden’s initial target of 21 per cent (which the UK opposes). The agreement to tax 20 per cent of companies’ global profits above a margin of 10 per cent also creates a potential loophole. Amazon, whose profit margin was 6 per cent in 2020, would not fall under this rule. Countries would be left seeking to tax Amazon Web Services, its lucrative cloud-computing division, as a  separate entity. 

Yet until now, the mere concept of global taxation was treated as utopian, more suited to the pages of the French economist Thomas Piketty’s Capital (2013) than to a G7  communiqué. The Overton window – the term used to describe the range of politically acceptable policies – has shifted.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

What accounts for this transformation? The vast debts ­accrued by governments during the Covid-19 pandemic (the UK’s national debt has risen to 98.5 per cent of GDP) have incentivised leaders to find new sources of revenue. Rishi Sunak, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, has pledged to increase the UK’s corporation tax rate from 19 per cent to 25 per cent by 2023 on such grounds. But the political shift also reflects an impatience with the piety and hypocrisy of the major tech firms, which speak of creating a better world while depriving governments of the tax revenue they need to help fund one. Though wealth is sometimes attributable to individual genius, it is often socially produced. As the economist Mariana Mazzucato charted in her book The Entrepreneurial State (2013), the  12 key technologies behind the iPhone, such as the touch-screen, the Global Positioning ­System and the internet itself, were all the product of state-funded research. A healthy, educated workforce  depends upon the high-quality public services that only ­governments can provide. 

Twice within the past 13 years – during the 2008 financial crisis and the Covid pandemic – states have been forced to intervene as guarantors of the economy. In a new age of environmental catastrophe, infectious disease and great-power conflict, they will have to do so again. 

The world needs a tax system commensurate with these responsibilities. The age of fiscal impoverishment – when governments were reduced to begging corporations for token amounts – must end. Rather than treating tax as a burden to be reduced, companies must recognise it as due payment for the ultimate insurance system: the active state. 

This article appears in the 09 Jun 2021 issue of the New Statesman, The Covid cover-up?