Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Business
  2. Economics
28 January 2016

The child was 11, maybe 12, and he was trying to buy a branch of Starbucks

As the tiny Donald Trump waved his Blackberry, I thought: I really have to stop living in Hampstead.

By Tanya Gold

I’ve seen a child try to buy the lease on a Starbucks. “You can’t close down,” I heard him tell the barista: “I’ve broken up with so many women in here.”

I am nosy, and the word “women” – coming from a voice that hadn’t broken, such a squeaky, self-important voice – was intriguing, so I went round the corner, and saw a tiny person – maybe he was 11, maybe 12 – demand to know the price of the lease.

“Expensive,” said the barista, laughing, which was an error.

It hurt the tiny person: his blond head drooped back to childhood; he looked, briefly, like a little boy. He fought back by whipping out a BlackBerry and stabbing it with his fingers. “I can afford it,” he said, and blew his shoulders out so he looked like a small Donald Trump. “You have no idea. Get the manager!” All this time, he was dressed in his school uniform.

I wept for the end of innocence and the darkness of man’s heart; I wondered whether the plutocrats devour, first, their own; I felt amazement that Starbucks could inspire an emotion so significant that a tiny man would fight for it, with his own pocket money; I wondered why. (Loneliness. What else? Starbucks was his only friend.)

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Then I thought: I really have to stop living in Hampstead.

Content from our partners
How automation can help telecoms companies unlock their growth potential
The pandemic has had a scarring effect on loneliness, but we can do better
Feel confident gifting tech to your children this Christmas

It’s clear that the only person in London pretending that Hampstead – which is both a place and a sneer, from dying Telegraph reader to smirking New Statesman reader – is not spiritually dead is me. I may love a cause, social democracy, that it is truly lost; but this is absurd. I apologise if I’m late to the battle and have missed it, but I am, in many ways, a delusional maniac.

I think I knew it was over during the 2011 riots. I looked out the window on to the high street. A gang of teenagers was approaching Kurt Geiger. The 2011 uproar was chiefly a shoe riot – and why not? Their voices were, very slightly, raised. A police car screeched up. The riot was rescheduled to a time convenient for all.

I think I knew it was over when I offered the tramp outside the Coffee Cup a coffee. “Thanks,” he said, “I’d like a latte” – and pointed at Maison Blanc – “from there.”

I think I knew it was over when I saw James Corden outside Melrose and Morgan, because all significant social change takes place, in Hampstead, in the shadow of whimsical bread. He’s not a terrible person, James Corden – but Peter Cook, who lived on Perrin’s Walk until he drank himself to death, like a proper comic, he is not. Or I knew it when I saw Ricky Gervais at the dry-cleaners. Ricky Gervais is a terrible person; and he’s not Peter Cook, either.

And now Starbucks is priced out. This signals many things, such as: the weird dichotomy that early-20th-century progressives liked living in a fake 18th-century spa village need trouble us no more. 

This article appears in the 27 Jan 2016 issue of the New Statesman, Should Labour split?