Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Business
  2. Economics
31 May 2012updated 26 Sep 2015 6:47pm

Opinionomics | 31 May 2012

Must-read comment and analysis. Featuring Paris Hilton and Socrates. An unlikely pairing.

By Alex Hern

1. FAQ: Why is Spain now in crisis? And can it be fixed? (Washington Post | Wonkblog)

Brad Plumer gives the skinny on Spain. Things aren’t looking too hot.

2. Paris Hilton’s Sad Dating Life And The Collapse Of The Global Economy (Business Insider)

Did you know Paris Hilton’s dating life is a bellweather for the macroeconomic state of affairs? It’s true: Joe Weisenthal looks back.

3. Addressing Europe’s risks (Reuters)

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

Felix Salmon points out that the complacency built up in the EU over the last decade has just made the breakdown all the worse.

4. Good Comments (The Grumpy Economist)

John Cochrane has a bit of a go at Paul Krugman.

5. Hoisted from the Archives: A Non-Sokratic Dialogue on Social Welfare Function (Brad DeLong)

Ripped from the past, DeLong argues – coincedentally – against the sort of focus which Cochrane believes is crucial to economics, concluding that “to assume a position of relativism–like the claim to be neutral on issues of distribution–is really a statement that you are on the side of the powerful.”