Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Business
  2. Economics
1 October 2015

Housing associations are under pressure – but we’re doing our best

Housing associations face a fraught future - but this deal is a good one, says David Orr.

By David Orr

I read with interest Tom Copley’s piece on the offer that that we at the National Housing Federation are considering making to government on their manifesto commitment to extend Right to Buy to housing association tenants.  His is a voice worth listening to.  Since his election as a member of the London Assembly he has been a strong advocate for solving the capital’s housing crisis and he has regularly been at the forefront of London’s debate on the issue.

However, Tom has misrepresented the nature of our potential offer to government and in doing so has cast aspersions on the housing association movement as a whole.

Firstly, and to be completely clear, the offer is voluntary.  Our offer, if accepted by the government, will mean that housing associations will have discretion not to sell.  We offer a presumption in favour of sale in most circumstances but the final decision rests with the board.  With a statutory RTB, the decision is taken by the government.  The discounts that the government wishes to offer to tenants would in some circumstances be portable and the sector – all 1,100 of the associations we represent – would adapt and distribute the burden amongst themselves depending on their specific organisation’s priorities.  Some would sell many homes whilst others might sell few.  It is that flexibility which makes this offer much more suitable for housing associations.

Tom points out that the Conservative manifesto says the scheme will be paid for by the government requiring councils to sell off high value empty homes.  This would require legislation and can be challenged in Parliament.  We in the Federation have not endorsed this proposal and we don’t do so now. 

Tom goes on to accuse us of “collaborating” in a “shady deal” to avoid parliamentary scrutiny.  I will ignore the loaded implications of his language here and instead focus on the facts.  Housing associations are independent social businesses. The Conservative government won the election on a manifesto that included the extension of Right to Buy to housing associations.  We believe a statutory obligation to sell our homes would compromise the independence of housing associations and lead to a high risk that they are classified as public bodies.   Our offer would substantially reduce that risk.  The risk that housing associations might lose their ability to make their own decisions, determine the use of their own assets and own their own future is one I cannot take.  The consequences for our ability to build the homes we desperately need would be severe. 

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. Your new guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture each weekend - from the New Statesman. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Finally, Tom says agreeing to this deal would be an act of “self-interest not social conscience”.  To that I say – if it is self-interested to want to retain our independence, which has been fundamental in enabling us to secure £76 billion in private investment over the last 30 years, build 50,000 homes last year and provide five million men, women and children across the country with homes and security, then I plead self-interest.  But do not question the social conscience of the thousands of people we represent who work tirelessly every day to build and run those homes for those men, women and children who need them.

I understand the strong feelings on this issue.  I believe that we share with Tom a commitment to providing the new homes the nation needs. But I firmly and passionately believe that the offer hope to make to government safeguards housing associations’ businesses and social missions in the years and decades to come and allows us to deliver that ambition.