Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. UK Politics
25 May 2021updated 21 Jul 2021 1:49pm

Why did the government change Covid guidance without announcing it?

New advice, which seems to amount to local lockdowns, appeared on the UK government website on Friday evening.

By Ailbhe Rea

People in Kirklees, Bedford, Burnley, Leicester, Hounslow and North Tyneside – the areas of England most affected by the Indian variant of coronavirus – should try to avoid meeting indoors and travelling in and out of affected areas unless it is for essential purposes.

This guidance was published on the government website on Friday evening (21 May), but with no accompanying announcement. Four days later, local health officials, councils and MPs for the areas have reacted with anger at the lack of notice before, or indeed after, these changes, which were unearthed by the team at the Manchester Evening News. The government is now facing accusations that it has been trying to impose local lockdowns by stealth.

So what’s going on? MPs this morning are baffled by the whole thing, with one noting that ministers would have needed to approve the changes. But the fact that it has blindsided even local Conservative MPs suggests that sign-off didn’t happen, or that something went wrong. While some MPs are wondering whether the advice was in fact published in error, Downing Street has said that the press conference on 14 May about the Indian coronavirus variant, which didn’t contain specific guidance beyond urging caution, effectively amounted to an announcement of these changes.

Everyone should now avoid non-essential travel to these areas and local residents should not leave these areas for non-essential purposes, the government has advised, while stressing that this is only advice and that work and education both comprise essential reasons for travel. But aside from adding to the alienation that many areas have felt at the imposition of local measures with insufficient communication or consultation, this raises questions about the value or otherwise of advice without regulation.   

[see also: How the Indian variant threatens recovery]

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

Londoners and fans of Bend it Like Beckham will note that Hounslow, one of the areas on the list, is located beside Heathrow airport, and the airport is indeed deemed to be in Hounslow by many people. The government will be thankful that Heathrow is technically in Hillingdon, so it hasn’t inadvertently advised against travel to one of the country’s major airports. But people in Hounslow, as in the other named areas, will now be asking themselves whether it is safe to go to work (in many cases for workers in Hounslow, at Heathrow), while people travelling through Hounslow on the Tube to and from this major hub airport will question whether it is safe. Scary-sounding advice from the government prohibits neither action but will make all of it feel less safe.   

MPs are clamouring for answers about how the advice managed to be issued in this way. But a lot of them have bigger questions about whether the next phase of coronavirus management will amount to this: measures, which the government is reluctant to enforce or communicate for fear of being seen to impose a local lockdown, potentially resulting in a worst-of-both worlds scenario that both alienates residents and does little to stop the spread of the virus. 

Content from our partners
Executing business ideas is easier than ever, and it’s going to kill a lot of companies
Creating an industrial strategy fit for purpose
“A third runway at Heathrow is not a silver bullet”