George Osborne is to take up a part-time role at asset management giant BlackRock.
The former Chancellor is understood to have been hired by the chief executive of the world’s biggest investor, Larry Fink. He will be working alongside his former economic adviser Rupert Harrison.
The appointment has been approved by the Independent Appointments Committee and Osborne intends to continue as a backbench MP.
He said: “I am excited to be working with the BlackRock Investment Institute as an adviser. BlackRock wants better outcomes for pensioners and savers – and I want to help them deliver that. It’s a chance for me to work part-time with one of the world’s most respected firms and a major employer in Britain.
“The majority of my time will be devoted to being an MP, representing my constituents and promoting the Northern Powerhouse. My goal is to go on learning, gaining new experience and get an even better understanding of the world.”
Once tipped as a future Prime Minister, Osborne’s career ambitions were stymied after he backed Remain in the EU referendum and was sacked in Theresa May’s Cabinet reshuffle. Whether he will find the halls of fund managers more comfortable than the green back benches is yet to be seen, but for now he has been clear he intends to continue his constituency duties.
He will work at the BlackRock Investment Institute, which researches geopolitical, technological and economic trends.
He is expected to provide insights on European politics and policy, Chinese economic reform, and trends such as low yields and longevity and their impact on retirement planning.
While the pay packet has not been officially confirmed, Sky News quoted a source saying it would be hundreds of thousands of pounds.
But the move will also place a pro-Remain former Chancellor at the heart of the City of London, just as his Tory front bench is losing its support over Brexit negotiations.
Speaking shortly after the EU referendum vote, BlackRock chief executive Fink said he “didn’t get a lot of sleep” the night of Brexit, and that the decision had led to greater uncertainty.