New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Comment
12 September 2024

The dark heart of Strictly Come Dancing

The show, once celebrated for its wholesomeness, is now emblematic of an uncomfortable truth in TV entertainment.

By Sarah Manavis

Among the life changes that occurred in the latter half of my twenties – dog ownership, a running habit, the pandemic – one thing I never planned on becoming was a die-hard Strictly fan. After living with my in-laws for a month, I became addicted to what had once seemed like a middle-aged series that required a substantial time commitment. I loved it for the same reasons everyone does: its variety, its warmth, the talent on show, the narrative arcs of the contestant, and the parasocial relationships I form with certain dancers and judges.

Strictly Come Dancing is synonymous with wholesome television: while judges may employ a tough-love approach, the show is powered by a deep kindness. This good feeling has long overpowered its seedier undercurrent: the marriage breakdowns and cheating scandals emerging between instructors and contestants (known as the “Strictly curse”); and the notoriously gruelling schedules and physically demanding rehearsals (many contestants have reported significant weight loss from the intensity of daily 9-5 workouts). The Strictly brand has weathered bad press with relative ease. It is beloved not just for its entertainment value but because of its status as gentle, guilt-free TV.

Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month
Content from our partners
The role and purpose of social housing continues to evolve
More than a landlord: A future of opportunity
Towards an NHS fit for the future
Topics in this article : ,