Charities warn Duncan Smith: 450,000 disabled people will lose out under Universal Credit
Work and Pensions Secretary promised that there would be "no losers" under the new programme.
By George Eaton Published 17 October 2012 8:51
"There will be no losers," Iain Duncan Smith said of his Universal Credit programme in November 2010. But a commission led by Paralympian Tanni Grey-Thompson (interviewed earlier this year by the NS) has found that there will, in fact, be 450,000 - all of them disabled.
Its report, based on surveys of 3,500 disabled people and their families, warns that 100,000 disabled children stand to lose up to £28 a week; 230,000 severely disabled people who do not have another adult to assist them are at risk of losing £28-£58 a week; and up to 116,000 disabled people who work could lose £40 a week. If true, and the government has denounced the study as "irresponsible scaremongering", Duncan Smith's vow to "make work pay" will ring hollow for thousands of people.
The report, Holes in the Safety Net: the impact of universal credit on disabled people and their families, is backed by The Children's Society, Citizens Advice and Disability Rights UK. Here's what Grey-Thompson, who shares the title of Britain's most successful Paralympian with cyclist Sarah Storey, had to say about it.
The findings of this report do not make easy reading. The clear message is that many households with disabled people are already struggling to keep their heads above water. Reducing support for families with disabled children, disabled people who are living alone, families with young carers and disabled people in work risk driving many over the edge in future.
Labour has responded by reaffirming its call for the government to delay the introduction of Universal Credit by a year and one wouldn't be surprised if Ed Miliband chooses to quiz David Cameron on this subject at today's PMQs. Shadow work and pensions secretary Liam Byrne said: "This report is another nail in the coffin for David Cameron's claims we are all in this together. The PM tried to hide it in the Commons, but this report lays bare the truth that he is snatching up to £1,400 from 100,000 disabled children yet offering a huge tax cut to millionaires. Disabled people and their families are being forced to pick up the tab for the government's shambolic mismanagement of our economy."
For the record, the Department for Work and Pensions described the report as "highly selective" and accused the commission of "highly selective". A spokeswoman said: "The truth is we inherited a system of disability support which is a tangled mess of elements, premiums and add-ons which is highly prone to error and baffling for disabled people themselves.
"Our reforms will create a simpler and fairer system with aligned levels of support for adults and children. More importantly, there will be no cash losers in the rollout of Universal Credit.
"In fact, hundreds of thousands of disabled adults and children will actually receive more support than now, including paying a higher rate of support for all children who are registered blind."
Laudable words, but the government will need to do much more to convince charities that the disabled, rightly viewed as the most worthy recipients of welfare by the public, will not lose out.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















11 comments
if New Statesman is £12 subscription we will pay it for you if you become a member of catalyst.
yes its free! Catalyst that is and then your subscription!
no gimmicks and you raise money for charity without changing anything or giving up any time- YOUR sponsored charity receives 100% of what you raise so no deductions anywhere - make a difference now!
Jon
error
The Government relies on general ignorance and plays on the "scrounger" rhetoric.Deliberate conflating of DLA/ESA to suggest all are out of work.The biggest hit is the change of the method of uprating,an exponential decrease in real terms over time.It is mooting a further change in that regard,citing the false distinction between "tax payers" and "unemployed",when the facts are that the vast majority of people on benefits work and/or not expected to work.Lies and distortion abound with particular regard to DLA the increase in numbers is a total unexpected development as people do not conveniently die upon reaching pensionable age.only working age recipients are being moved to PIP."cash protection" a ruse rendered valueless due to inflation and a change of circumstances removes this guarantee,no matter how short a time it may be and if the previous situation recurs.Contribution ESA disappears after a year for most.Carers (the "angels" of preelection debates"-capped,deemed workless even if they work,subject to the "making work pay" false pretension by increased Council tax if of working age ;their carees also;even though the alternative of the "lifestyle style choice" would cost the State far more.I suggest the jury is not out as to the intentions of Government in relation to disabled people and by association their families and Carers and all decent people must attempt to fight against further intentions
If the whole point is to cut the support to disabled people then it's not exactly a warning is it? More a confirmation. It's shameful targeting. Pure and simple
'Worthy recipients' ? Way to go, NS.
'Worthy recipients' ? Way to go, NS.
Nice Starbucks coffee in his hands!
"There will be no losers" is a lie, a monstrous one. God help us when this Universal Credit starts. Thousand will lose and suffer for no crime.
Meanwhile, thousands of disabled people ALREADY have lost around £400 per month.
These people have been found unfit for work by ATOS. But IDS decided they should have Employment Support Allowance for only one year. They are still disabled, have paid their National Insurance contributions, but might have savings, or a partner who works even part time.
On this basis, why is IDS being paid, when he has money in the bank?
It is not only disabled people who live with their families and who are in work who will suffer. I live with my family and do not work because I am too disabled (a computer literate carer is typing this to my dictation0n). The Independent Living Fund is to be abolished in 2015, and local authorities are supposed to make up the difference at a time when they themselves are being strigently cut. The Disability Living Allowance does not only apply to people in work. This is to be replaced next April by a fund which laughably is supposed to give me personal independence. All I can see is a future which is considerably more limited and constrained than my already limited and constained present. And I do not want to live it.
I would like to know why Iain Duncan Smith has not been sacked.
He has openly REFUSED to be moved from the DWP in the latest cabinet reshuffle, hang on, he's Refused an order from the Prime Minister to be moved?
Is he above David Cameron? does he rule the Conservative Party? - No he doesn't, he's an employee of the Conservative Party and as such should be sacked for insurboardination.
No worries, they will all be found fit for work by ATOS and not deemed disabled enough to receive PIP. They can then be sanctioned because they are not doing enough to find work. Already happening.