Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

True Grit (15)

The Coen brothers are the most conservative of directors.

The Coen brothers could make slick, handsome genre pieces in their sleep, and that's what they've done with True Grit. Their version of the western, which takes its cue from Charles Portis's novel, is less jolly and knockabout than the well-known 1969 film that completed John Wayne's transformation into a leathery teddy bear and proved that Glen Campbell's attempts at acting could make grown men weep as readily as "Wichita Lineman" could. But a darkness of mood can still be placatory and there isn't a shot, cut or musical cue in True Grit to disturb the calm waters through which these most conservative of directors continue to drift.

The setting is Arkansas in the late 19th century, though it might equally be the inside of a snow globe. Snow is used here as magic dust to bring pop-up poetry to the plainest image and to vary the visual range of a sun-baked genre. The first thing we see is snow falling into a beam of orange light that streams from a house; it lends the illusion of movement to what would otherwise be a tableau. Sprawled on the ground is a man, shot dead by his employee. His principled, 14-year-old daughter, Mattie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld), spends the rest of the film urging others to bring his murderer to book.

Mattie has a lawyer's nimble mind, the rapid-fire words-per-minute of a screwball minx and twin plaits as thick as a hangman's rope. It's necessary that she comes across as smart but not smart-alecky - she has to ridicule her elders' failings, from their illiteracy to their hairstyles, without making us want to cheer when one slighted fellow takes her across his knee for a switching. Steinfeld, acting in her first film, achieves this by sounding credulous notes and transmitting faint flashes of panic from deep within Mattie's armour-plated confidence.

Her companion in the quest for vengeance is Rooster Cogburn (Jeff Bridges), the eyepatch- wearing marshal she has hired to catch her father's killer and whom she insists on accompanying against his wishes. We hear Cogburn before we first see him. The girl raps on an outhouse door, disturbing him at stool. The ungodly croak that responds could be his turd talking. The reality isn't much prettier. When Wayne played Cogburn, he was riffing indulgently on his own persona, whereas Bridges pulls the role over himself as though warding off winter under a pile of ratty blankets. His voice is almost unintelligible and he moves with a lurching uncertainty; there's a touch of Jabba the Hutt about him that is only exaggerated beside the prissy Texas ranger LaBoeuf (Matt Damon), who joins the manhunt. Even an actor of the calibre of Bridges has trouble finding anything new in the buddy-movie dynamic that kicks in whenever Cogburn and LaBoeuf bicker or try to outshoot one another.

What the Coen brothers believe they can bring to the western is anyone's guess. The quirky visual fillip remains their strong suit - the delightful strangeness of a hanged man dangling from a needlessly high branch, or an approaching horse that appears to be ridden by a bear. Yet they seem incapable of sustaining emotional effects for more than a scene at a time. Too often, they settle for either a simplistic melancholy, as in the recurring shots that gaze longingly backwards from Mattie's perspective, or an all-purpose wryness in the face of death - what might once have been called ironic detachment but has now hardened into a kind of gallows smugness.

True Grit begins with a corpse and ends with a lone figure beside a tombstone. Death is a constant presence on the journey, as it often is in the western. The human body is being taken apart here long before the worms are given a chance to tuck in: teeth are removed, fingers are severed, an arm is amputated, a tongue is bitten almost in two and a ribcage is filled with writhing snakes. But death is not quite the Great Leveller, as a Native American prisoner finds when he attempts to deliver his final words alongside other condemned men: a hood is pulled over his head before he can finish speaking. It is a piercing detail in its own right, but the picture has nothing more than a superfluous "Hear, hear!" to add to that mournful refrain from Clint Eastwood's Unforgiven: "We all got it coming."

17 comments

JOHN WARD's picture

Does anybody go to the movies to enjoy themselves any more and lets keep Sight & Sound out of it!!

mitchy's picture

Tom Cruise is what makes me not want to watch a Tom Cruise film at all.

theBarry's picture

Since the "Western" is essentially an American historical phenomena, perhaps the British should not bother reviewing it. The genre has produced magnificent films and the re-make of True Grit is a worthy addition.

john russell's picture

brilliant, superb review

Seaman T's picture

Time the great American wild west myth was consigned to the same spittoon of history as they have done with every other empire.
Move on old timer's, it's time to start getting real, tough boys, and "Mule tie Cultural".

Graham's picture

It annoys me in the new statesman that we have to have such snobs reviewing movies. If a film is popular the aim in the new statesman is to show itself above the un-intellectual riff-raff.

MP, idFilm's picture

I agree with much of this. I wrote the following at my own blog:

In S&S, Ben Walters describes Cogburn as "agreeably pitiless", but that's a rather confused assessment, failing as it does to acknowledge the convenient traits of his character that allows the Coens to make us root for such a ruthless lawman. Indeed, the film's fundamental appeal lies in Cogburn as the toughened but "essentially good father figure"...

True Grit remains a quiet film with little to say on its chosen themes of justice and retribution as sought and carried out by a 14-year-old girl.

Without a serious commitment to any of these issues, the film becomes a problematic endorsement of revenge...

http://idfilm.blogspot.com/2011/02/true-grit-2010.html

Shoot the Critic's picture

I very much agree with your review. The Coens have become extremely conservative in their last few movies, and it has been disappointing. With this remake they haven't pushed themselves any further or introduced anything new. The film is a good one -- their talent for classic filmmaking is undeniable -- but it's not anything special. It's no "Fargo" or "Miller's Crossing."
My two favorite scenes were the ones you pointed out -- the man hanging from the tree with Mattie climbing up to cut him down and getting a bird's eye-view of the events happening down below & the bear-suit wearing man riding a horse. Both visual quirks that give some dimension to an otherwise flat, by-the-book film.
- Shoot the Critic, film&TV site http://shootthecritic.com

rp's picture

I think the message comes through, as in the book, that yes this was the only exciting thing that ever happened to Ms Ross and that she was destined to live her life as a severe and unloved person.
I think that the hint at a romance with LaBoeuf made this even more apparent and much better put than the JW version. I also think the Coens played down the sections of the original out of respect, they didn't mess with the Ned Pepper character because the original was so good and they left out a lot of the original dialogue out of respect too. Introducing their own and other from the book. The Bear dentist character., to me , hinted that they have read more than one McCarthy book because characters like this are straight out of Blood Meridian. Now that would be a good Coen film.

All in all a great re-make of a great film of a great book.

I'm a big JW fan but this was brilliant

Nash1's picture

This is a great film - this review does not do it justice.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets