Cameron tells Pakistanis tax non-payment is unfair
David Cameron criticises Pakistan’s tax-dodging rich at a press conference in Islamabad.
By Liam McLaughlin Published 05 April 2011 18:33
In a speech at a press conference in Islamabad, David Cameron told Pakistan's elite that:
Many of your richest people are getting away without paying much tax at all – and that's not fair.
When considering Cameron's words, let's remember that the UK facilitates the very same actions through its sovereignty over 13 of the 24 biggest tax havens in the world, including Jersey, Guernsey, the Cayman Islands and the City of London.
First, it is important to note that the vast majority of people considered "rich" in the UK do pay their taxes. According to Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC), there are roughly 327,000 people who earn more than £150,000 per year – the rate at which the 50p tax is introduced. HMRC predicts that by the end of this fiscal year, the richest 327,000 will be paying 26.7 per cent of the total tax collected in the country.
Nevertheless, a request filed by the London Evening Standard under the Freedom of Information Act in 2007 revealed that in 2004-2005 only 65 of the roughly 400 UK-based individuals who earn £10m per year or more actually paid income tax. The failure was estimated to have lost HMRC up to £2bn in revenues.
The related issue of companies in the UK not paying tax has been brought to mainstream attention by the recent UK Uncut protests – fingering Vodafone, Topshop and Boots, among others, as having allegedly "dodged" paying billions.
The chairman of Pakistan's Federal Bureau of Revenue (FBR), Salman Siddiqui, recently issued notices to the wealthiest 700,000 of Pakistan's 2.3 million rich to give up withheld taxes. Although the number of non-payers is far higher than estimates in the UK, Cameron would be better advised to clean up the UK's own mess first before preaching to other countries.
Surprisingly, Cameron did not make the distinction between tax evasion and tax avoidance in his speech. Whereas the latter is considered legal – when taxes are not paid, using the help of loopholes – the former is considered illegal: non-payment of taxes that breaks the law.
A committee was set up to investigate the costs and benefits of having a General Anti-Avoidance Rule for the UK earlier this year. It has until 31 October 2011 to come to a conclusion.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















15 comments
David Cameron is to give £600 million to the epicentre of world terrorism. What's that about Pakigelt?
Hahaha!
The man's hypocrisy knows no bounds. Self-serving toff wanker.
Sometimes I wonder whether money given in Aid to some of these countries is really a cover for something else, be it for their Financial Buddies to cream off or Military purposes. Whatever the case only a small percentage ever gets through to try and fool us into believing it's been used.
You scratch my back if you scratch mine !
Was meant to write : I will scratch your back if you scratch mine !
Mr Cameron would be better worrying about his own tax dodging millionaires/tory party donators, rather than critisizing a foreign government about their taxation policies. Complete hypocrisy, but I've come to expect that from this Tory government. We apparently have no money for public services but we do have £5 million a day to throw at military action in Libya. Hypocrites!
Sam
I'm not comparing, I'm saying people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, he has no right to lecture anyone on tax. Whether pakistan's tax system is worse than ours or not does not detract from that point.
Quite agree with your thinking on land tax
Pot and kettle spring to mind as does the saying don't go on about the speck in other people's eyes whilst ignoring the plank in your own.
Wow. Just, Wow.
Lou - Pakistan's wealthy pay less tax than Britain's and there's much less redistrution of wealth than there is here, so you have the plank and the speck the wrong way around.
Sam
We're splitting hairs now. Just because Pakistan fails miserably on redistribution of wealth from tax collection does not justify Cameron preaching to them when he can't get his own house in order on tax.
Rather like his delivering a speech on democracy and peace whilst on an arms trade jolly, I find him somewhat hypocritical.
People in glasshouses you stupid man Cameron- how can you tell Pakistan this crap when you ignore the issue in the country you are SUPPOSED to be running.
The scale of corruption and incompetance in Pakistan pales into insignifcance when compared to that of Britain. In Pakistan corruption and incompetance in Govt is a way of life. so Cameron is perfectly right to lecture the Pakistanis on pulling their socks up.
But the reasons behind that corruption and incompetance lie in the culture in the religion and the attitude to civic responsibility, and interference from foreign powers, and will take two more generations to change.
Interesting because David Camerons best buddie George Osborne along with many other Tories and their associates are well known to avoid, evade and basically get away with paying their fair share of taxes so the Pakistanis must have been really fighting hard to hold back the laughter.
I guess you can say that David Cameron has made himself look like Mr Bean once again because along with that idiotic statement a vast portion of Aid or other payments donated to Pakistan will be creamed off one way or another.
Lou - whilst you may want wealthy people in the UK to pay more tax, it's hardly splitting hairs. I very much doubt that the percentage paid by the rich in Pakistan is in any way comparable to here. If you add the corruption and crony corporatism then the rich benefit the rest of Pakistani society even less.
To compare Britain to Pakistan is as ridiculous as comparing the anti-cuts movement to the struggle for freedom in the Arab world.
In any case, I favour a land value tax, which would be much more efficient at collecting taxes from the wealthiest than our current system which basically invites people to avoid tax.
Lou - splitting hairs? Like the anti-cuts movement and the struggle for freedom in the Arab world, yeah?
Post new comment