The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

David Cameron’s China visit

He won’t find many of his kind of liberal there.

In recent years there has been a stream of weighty publications about China, not least When China Rules the World by the former NS columnist Martin Jacques and Will Hutton's The Writing on the Wall (which, I'm told, earned him the nickname "the Great Will of China" among Observer colleagues).

There has also been some terrific reporting from the country, notably in this magazine by Channel 4 News's Lindsey Hilsum when she was based there, as well as the very odd column in that otherwise excellent periodical, Prospect, by a man who spends all his time moaning about what a God-awful place it is to live but curiously shows no sign of departing for somewhere he might find more congenial.

However, when it comes to the Kremlinology of China's leadership, the picture is still very far from clear. Next week David Cameron will lead Britain's largest ever delegation to the country, bringing five ministers and 50 businessmen with him. It has been suggested that although the purpose of the visit is trade, he will be expected to raise the issue of human rights – in particular China's treatment of the Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo – while he is there.

This is a familiar demand – every western leader is told to ask about human rights in China, regardless of whether it is likely to achieve anything or, indeed, just irritate their hosts, who have made their annoyance about being lectured by outsiders abundantly plain.

As Xi Jinping, who is lined up to be the next president, put it last year: "There are some well-fed foreigners who have nothing better to do than point fingers at our affairs. China does not, first, export revolution; second, export poverty and hunger; third, cause troubles for you. What else is there to say?"

In this instance, however, there is the extra encouragement that such talk might not be falling on entirely deaf ears. For a belief has grown up that the Chinese premier, Wen Jiabao, is an ardent reformist, a "lonely fighter for freedom and democracy", as the Singapore Straits Times's Peh Shing Huei wrote yesterday.

I recommend Peh's article "Is Wen really a liberal?" as a cold shower for those desperate to believe that the supposed censorship back home of Wen's "daring remarks" in an interview with CNN's Fareed Zakaria last month is an indication of deep divisions at the top, with one faction ready to push for an Orchid Revolution. Peh quotes a Hong Kong analyst dismissing this point:

"This has happened before," said Willy Lam. "Interviews with the western press are not necessarily reported, even when they talk about non-controversial and completely benign matters."

You can read the whole piece, in which Peh takes apart the case for Wen as a liberal, here, but his conclusion is certainly sobering.

It would be more accurate to label him [Wen] a "centrist" than a liberal. He preaches reform within the party and, even then, at a glacial pace. China will change, but it will be to entrench, not weaken, the CCP's rule. It will be socialism with Chinese characteristics, as Mr Wen stressed in Shenzhen. Nothing else.

During the general election campaign Cameron spoke harshly about China. And this is not to say that the rest of the world is not right to be concerned about the plight of those who express dissent in China, or anywhere else. But although a few strong words may go down well with a British audience, they will ring hollow – or worse, ring of a misplaced and outdated sense of importance – in Asia.

The Prime Minister has no big stick to wield. If he wants to make a success of his visit, he should stick to trade talks. Whatever kind of "liberal" Premier Wen is, it's certainly not any kind that Dave would recognise.

14 comments

ConcernedCitizen's picture

@ Simon: "Chins do not export terrorism, drop bombs on civilians or detain people in prison colonies unlike some countries."

Is this the best the captain of the Mao Brigade can do? Chinese communists do not export terrorism no because the Korean War or the Maoist Insurgency in India don't come to mind; drop bomb on civilians yeah because the Sino-Vietnam War didn't kill civilians; and of course political dissidents like Liu Xiaobo aren't in jail.

Grant's picture

All this fuss about what everyone thinks about each other. In my world we all have warts and a wart is a wart. It is ugly and unsightly. Stop trying to compare warts and accept that it is far more valuable looking inwards at ourselves and understanding our own nations and what we can do to make a difference at home. Perhaps this is why the very odd author of the column in the periodical, Prospect, (Mark Kitto) remains in China so as not to have to return home and begin moaning about his home. Smart thinking i would imagine. Its far more fun moaning about others :-)

Daniel's picture

I think people forget that China’s come a long way from where it was. Extreme poverty is massively reduced; there are greater economic rights, better standards of living, a more healthy and educated population, and more social rights than many thought was possible. Far from perfect, far from equitable, far from democratic, but better than what it was.
As their economy continues to grow the state begins to decline and struggle in keeping control of its people.
China is not a democratic country, but in 20 years from now China will have evolved further. It will have a more equitable and just judicial system and greater political freedom too. The fight for democracy in every generation grows from popular movements and social pressure, not from a British PM or even a “centrist” Chinese Premier for that matter. So I partly agree with the article. Get the business, come home, and leave the Chinese to determine their own destinies.

suffolk's picture

All countries fear the growing power of China, which will be the only world superpower by 2030.And they have every right to fear a vile and brutal Chinese regime,one which commits genocide in Tibet against a very spiritual people who want to be left alone; and which treats Han Chinese dissidents nearly as brutally, just because they criticise
peacefully. David Cameron, and other major world democratic leaders should start to tell China that its record is too appalling for them to be treated as a civilised country.Instead of taking 50 businessmen with him, he should be warning the Chinese regime that no civilised country will do business until China stops behaving like the evil and brutal and uncivilised state that it is.
But go on, Cameron---forget what the UK used to stand for : go and get business for products made free in China by political prisoners, including imprisoned innocent Tibetan monks and nuns, whose plight Amnesty International has continually highlighted.
Remember Neville Chamberlain in the late 1930s ?????

Simon's picture

Do western countries who criticise China's human rights record really concern about the rights of ordinary Chinese? I doubt that very much especially when they couldnt care enough about the lives of their own people back home. Activists are mostly made up of free loaders and anarchist pretending to be concern about human rights but these same people most likely won't be interested in engaging ordinary Chinese people, participate in Chinese cultural events or express any genuine concern of racism ordinary Chinese suffered in foreign countries. All this points to one or two motiviating factor which is born from fear of China's rise and jealous of its success.

ang's picture

Cameron is not interested in the ordinary people in his own country, so he will be indifferent to the Chinese.
Camerons' ambition is to privatise everything and to see growth soar, because of HIS actions, but as most people who post on this site know, he is such a deluded man.
China, can you keep him cause we don't want him.

Simon's picture

Obviously Suffolk has never visited China, met any of the country's "dissedents or knew anything about Chinese and Tibetan history. Most of what Suffolk believes in comes from his devotion on the tabloid gutter press. I doubt Suffolk has any interest in Chinese people and their culture except bear grudges and hatred and find every reason to hate the country's rise. Chins do not export terrorism, drop bombs on civilians or detain people in prison colonies unlike some countries.

suffolk's picture

Yes, I HAVE visited China ( refused entry to Tibet !!)----and ordinary people were too scared to talk to me about what had happened in "The Square" ( have people forgotten??); and "minders " and secret police harassed me and people who I talked to----and took constant video film.
How can people be expected to live like this ? Thank God we live in a civilised and democratic country where WE can criticise Govt policy, verbally abuse our PM, carry out protests. One Chinese did tell me that her husband had criticised lack of press freedom and she had never seen him again. Where is the rightful Panchen Lama----the youngest political prisoner in the world when he was taken to nowhere-knows by the vicious Peking regime ?
How can we deal with such people as those that govern China. I have nothing against the Chinese people .....except that they seem to allow the lack of freedom , the genocide of their ethnic minorities, the ban on religion ( it is a death penalty to own a photo of HH The Dalai Lama ). What sort of country has such "laws" ???
And somebody actually thinks that Europeans and Americans are jealous of China-------are you out of your mind ?????????????????????????????
I am leaving this blog and concentrating on the civilised world: countries unlike China, Burma, North Korea, Iran, etc.
They are a disgrace to the map of the world. I wonder if Cameron will raise human rights issues with the Chinese "leaders" ; and also ask why every country has been threatened by China to boycott the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony , which is being held to honour an outstandingly brave man.

Benedict's picture

If Cameron is true to form, he'll criticise China when he's in a neighbouring country, but only then.

writeoff's picture

Socialism with Chinese characteristics? China has Totalitarian Capitalism. We should hope is isn't a successful combination.

sasha's picture

simon is a 50 center - wu mao dang. Simon, you should be happy that other nations are concerned about human rights in your country. I live in China, and all my chinese friends were secretly proud of Liu Xiabo winning a nobel prize.

I don't understand your comment about westerners not caring about people in their own country. In the west we believe in the value of the individual over society. In China it is the other way round. It's a clash of ideas rather than people picking on China. As a human being I find China's view that people should be sacrificed for the 'good' of society rather odd.

What China lacks is cynicism towards their leaders. They are just human beings, they can't be 100% correct all the time and the population has the right to question them.

"Chins do not export terrorism, drop bombs on civilians or detain people in prison colonies unlike some countries." - This weird view that the CCP has no blood on it's hands, that it is purer than any western nation is ignorance. The CCP sells weapons (like any other nations) - particularly in Africa, it sells weapons to Darfur (but is trying to make the UN stop releasing it's most recent report), it has been known to sell weapons to two sides in a conflict. The CCP detains it's own people, you know that. The CCP supports foul regimes because if it doesn't, it won't have access to their natural resources (Burma, Iran). Can you please tell me what you know about the CCP and it's support for Pol Pot between 1970 and 1994? Very little I imagine, but that is due to censorship. Censorship is breeding ignorance in your nation. China will lead the world as the most ignorant and arrogant race. Ignorant of their own history and the actions of their country. Like any other country, China isn't perfect. Stop thinking, 'people hate us because we are chinese/have a strong economy' - it's not because of that. It's because your government will not admit to the things it does.

Tang He's picture

@ConcernedCitizen

"Chinese communists do not export terrorism no because the Korean War or the Maoist Insurgency in India don't come to mind"

Chinese involvement in the Korean war was fought on an open field of battle alongside North Korea against the armies of the UN, just because they had a different ideology than the west does not mean they are "terrorists", which you seem to think is a blanket term for "anti-American." Also, what proof do you have for Maoist rebels in India being supported by the Chinese aside from their "Maoist" ideology? In fact, China recently signed a huge arms deal with the Philippines armed forces to help them combat Maoist and Islamic rebels which you would know about if you actually paid attention to current events as opposed to spitting out the same threat sensing anti-China drivel in the guise of being "concerned." More importantly, which of the events you listed less Liu Xiaobo's imprisonment are still relevant in the present tense?

@sasha
"What China lacks is cynicism towards their leaders."

If you actually live in China then you must have somehow not met any Chinese people there. At any cab ride, restaurant table, or mahjong table you can hear people discussing politics and expressing the same sort of disgust and derision you would hear in a politics talk in the West. Essentially all Chinese KNOW that all their officials are corrupt. And since when is cynicism a good thing? Part of the reason so many Chinese put up with restriction on political freedom is because they don't think they can do anything about it, not because they don't know it exists.

@suffolk
"I am leaving this blog and concentrating on the civilised world"

Good riddance to a bad troll, sorry we Chinese are so primitive and lowly compared to you but we just can't help it you know.

One phenomenon I've been noticing is the instant tendency to call any dissent toward China-bashing "Wu mao dang." Although it is certainly applicable at times, it acts as a tool to instantly nullify the validity of the commentator's words, and as an excuse to ignore their opinion, genuine or not, by plugging one's own ears. Westerners like to think they care about the developing world, and some of them may really do, but from experience I find most to be typical bandwagoneers jumping on the "free tibet" or "human rights" train so they can feel like they aren't consumerist exploitative leeches on the developing world. Being Chinese, trust that I DO care about China. I'm the one that sees kids losing their educations because they have to work in a factory or make bricks or collect rubbish so they can support their families. I'm the one that sees the ill denied medical care and thrown out of hospitals because they had no money, I'm the one that sees corrupt officials and developers rob land away from locals to build massive projects and apartments on top of a real-estate bubble, I see my grandmother whose landowning family was utterly shattered by the communists' land-reforms and the anti-capitalist policies decades ago. I see my father who was paraded through the streets as a child with a board proclaiming "Landlord's offspring" chained to his neck and spat on for the first 20 years of his life.

But I also see China and its people exponentially better off every couple of years, I see people organizing demonstrations and rallying on the internet that has managed to bend and influence government actions from sheer populist demand, I see new highways, power plants, railroads, airports, hospitals, schools, libraries, museums, and streets full of private cars and housed full of modern amenities.

What I feel is much sorrow, but simultaneously much optimism for China. Demand for personal freedoms come along with wealth, as the poor are more worried about getting by. This can be evidenced by Taiwan's democratization in the mid-1980s following a period of rapid economic growth and becoming prosperous as a society; this process is what Mainland China must strive toward and so far it looks to be on the right track.

China can be a brutal and terrible country, but it is dynamic and progressive. It needs a lot of things at the moment, but one group it can do without are idle Westerners who know nothing about the country crying crocodile tears about supposed "genocides of minorities" and "bans on religion" and other lies, and then try to sell it back to us Chinese. We know what's wrong with our own country, and most of the criticism from Westerners I've seen are not, and are not meant to be helpful, just insulting. Let the Chinese fix China.

Dominic2's picture

Spot on Sasha. Simon is blatantly not called "Simon"!

Dora Chen's picture

As a chinese, i don't want to argue about whether China is demoncratic or not. We have less civil rights on the surface indeed camparing to the western contries indeed. But, we are moving forward. 30 years ago, you may be sent to prison because of what you have said about the govenment' weekness, and now as you can see we are focusing on the domestic affairs more and more. lots of people are concerning about the polictics and human rights, and they are able to talk about it and question it. you need to think about where we were 30 years ago before you judge us restlessly.

Latest tweets