The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

How Ed can counter the Tories’ attack lines

It wasn’t the “union barons” who elected Ed, it was thousands of ordinary workers.

Tory HQ hoped and prayed for an opportunity to present "Red Ed" as a union shoo-in and, in the event, they've got one. Despite winning fewer votes from MPs/MEPs and party members than David, Ed secured the leadership on the strength of his support among affiliated trade unions and socialist societies.

David won 53 per cent of the MPs' vote to Ed's 47 per cent, and 54 per cent of the members' votes to Ed's 46 per cent. It was in the affiliated section that Ed won a decisive 60 per cent, allowing him to take the leadership by 28,000 votes.

"Labour's new leader is in hock to the unions," was the attack line taken up by the Tories and by Sky News's Adam Boulton and Kay Burley, who spoke of trade unionists as if they were an alien species, rather than a group that no fewer than six million Britons belong to.

The Conservative Party chairman, Baroness Warsi, declared in a statement:

Ed Miliband wasn't the choice of his MPs, wasn't the choice of Labour Party members, but was put into power by union votes. I'm afraid this looks like a great leap backwards for the Labour Party.

So, how should Ed respond when the issue is raised, as it undoubtedly will be, on The Andrew Marr Show tomorrow morning? He could point that all of the candidates, including David Miliband, received union endorsements during the contest, dispelling the myth that the unions flocked to him en masse.

But, to be more convincing, he must mount a principled defence of trade unionism and argue that the diversity of Labour's electoral college is a strength, not a weakness. He should remind the public that the union block vote was abolished years ago and that he won the support of thousands of ordinary workers (nurses, teachers, carers), many of whom fit neatly into David Cameron's "big society".

The right's line of attack would be far more dangerous for Ed if he had the sort of agenda that the public associates with militant trade unionism. But, much to the Tories' dismay, he doesn't. Policies such as the introduction of a national living wage, the replacement of tuition fees with a graduate tax, the inclusion of Trident in the strategic defence review and a permanent 50p tax rate have broad and popular appeal.

The Tories' cynical attempt to smear Labour's new leader as a union sop is likely to backfire when they realise just how many people agree with Ed.

32 comments

Richard's picture

Wonder how many X factor voters voted more than 10 times?
Warsi is a nasty disgrace of a woman who has to have a police guard to go to the shops in her own community. Last time she tried to walk the streets of Britain alone she was pelted with eggs by Muslim protesters.
She got her peerage because she threatened to sue the Tory party for racial descrimination after not being selected for a safe seat. Howard paniced and sh*t himself.
This Peer of our realm would be stoned to death in Iran/Saudi for running out on her first husband because he was too poor and too low rent for her.
I watched Chukka on Sky this morning and last night and he really does scare the crap out of the toad Boulton. He just doesn't know how to handle him.....a man to watch is out Chukka.

Findiglay's picture

@Richard

Who the heck is Chukka??

jie4v7i14's picture

Chukka? Another bloke that Boulton wants to scrap? Or is Chukka Campbell himself?

Hope it is not, and Chukka and Campbell will be a tag team against Boulton and 'That Sky Tart' in the wrestling ring. Good telly it would be.

RK's picture

@Richard, if the Muslim protesters harassing baroness Warsi is your idea of protest, as against bigotry, either you did not deserve to be born in this country or you should leave this country. You surely are a danger to the society.

These are same the bigots who were calling for implementing Sharia..in UK. How much of a rascal can you be Richard?

Rosie's picture

The arrogance of Warsi is hard enough to accept but her voice drives me insane, it is akin to chalk squeaking on a blackboard ugh! She failed to get elected so was given a peerage, for what exactly? The sooner we get people like that third rate wannabe out of politics the better.
Well done Ed, it is good to see that his appointment has got the Tories and their supporters so rattled, so they should be rattled too, Ed Miliband is an astute politician with and extremely high intellect, he has a bigger brain than Camoron, Osborne and Clegg out together.

Arthur Williamson's picture

WHAT A F###IN DISASTER.

Ed Miliband won the leadership contest on the strength of the union vote, the same unions who are going to make themselves unpopular over the next couple of years in their bid to fight their corner against the ConDem cuts (winter of discontent here we come).

At the next general election, (which could be next year if the AV Referendum fails and the Dems react by pulling out of the coalition), the Tory spin doctors and right wing media will have a field day. Imagine the headline - "The Unions who wrecked our lives with a winter of discontent gave us Red Milliband, do you really want him inside 10 Downing Street?"

The Tories will have the next general election on a plate. For Red Milliband read Michael Foot.

By the way, I wouldn`t be too quick to praise Chukka. On the BBC News Channel last night he was interviewed along with Lance Price. Chukka spoke very well, then, when it was Lance`s turn to speak, Lance warned of the dangers of Trade Union baggage and how the right wing media will try to exploit, at this point, Chukka handled himself badly in that, judging by his face, his nose looked well out of joint.

jie4v7i14's picture

Ys, Arthur, the Union vote, that is what is called democracy.

So you think the bubble can make the best choices, unlike us that live out in the real world, ey?

Gets me sometimes how ignorant and nieve people are, even if they sound mature. I blame Thatcher for growing a bunch of educated numbskulls myself.

Dave C's picture

@Arthur Williamson

Don't be so downhearted, Arthur. You backed Ed Balls (as did I on the first round) and he did much better than expected.

I don't think the union line of attack will have legs. In the pre-1993 days, the union 'barons' could indeed deliver substantial chunks of the electoral college without any requirement to consult or ballot their members.

This result was based on 200,000 or so trade union members voting from their own homes over a period of about a month. They're probably more representative of ordinary people than Labour Party members and MPs.

Arthur Williamson's picture

Will the "Union" attack have legs? Not at the moment, however, once the spending cuts come into force, the unions will fight their corner, I WILL SUPPORT THEM, but I`m not naive enough to believe the whole country will support them. Many people who will face disruption as a result of strike action get pissed off easily, FACT. Many people who get pissed off turn against the unions only because they are selfish, FACT. I do live in the real world and I am old enough to remember the winter of discontent and the delusionary era of Michael Foot and his loony lefties. I hope to God Labour don`t go down that route but I have my worries.

LiberalYouth's picture

He will do untill Lib Dems get Charles Kennedy back as Leader! I just hope he performs on policy like the Gradute Tax which he pinched from the LDs! Good call by the Labour party tho finally a leader with a slight liberal streak :)

shufflebox's picture

I agree, and one of David Miliband's supporters, I think it was Chris Bryant, made this very point. In many ways, surely it's a strength that Ed was elected, not by MPs in Westminster Village, nor by us perhaps atypical Labour Party members, but by working people throughout the country.

Even that though, isn't wholly true - he did, after all, get over 45% of both MPs' and members' votes - the whole point of the electoral college being you can't get in solely with the backing of one group.

Joseph A's picture

I'm sorry but 7 million people out of the 60 million people that make up the population doesn't impress me. More people voted in the x factor finals last year.

I think it's a real flaw having the unions bloc making up a third of the electoral college. The whole leadership contest should be changed in future with one member, one vote with unions offering its members free Labour membership if they want to sign up.

Chris W's picture

So, to be clear Joseph, if 7 million doesn't impress you, you'd rather what? We let everyone vote on our new leader, like a national referendum? Or do as other parties have and just have our members decide? (I'm not saying that's crazy, but it if 7 million doesn't impress you then surely taking 7 million OUT of the voting can't be better?)

He didn't win because of the unions. He got a big majority of their votes, but they only count for a third. He still had to win over big enough numbers of members and MPs to ensure he could win.

Lorraine's picture

Baroness Warsi failed to get elected as an MP so was given a life peerage instead. In her screeching hipocricy the lady doth protest too much, methinks.

Dave C's picture

Joseph A wrote, "I'm sorry but 7 million people out of the 60 million people that make up the population doesn't impress me."

Let's look at the other parties:

Conservative Party leadership election, 2005

David Cameron 134,446 voting
David Davis 64,398
Total voting 198,844

Liberal Democrats leadership election, 2007

Nick Clegg 20,988 votes
Chris Huhne 20,477
Total voting 41,465

Joseph A's picture

I meant the 7 million out of 60 million doesn't, in my view, justify the unions making up a third of the electoral college. It is still proportionally a small number of the population. Any suggestion that the unions represent a large section of the population, as the article makes out, rings hollow.

One member, one vote.

Ron in U.S.'s picture

The Tories are doing Labour the same way the Republicans have done the Democrats.

I hope your countrymen can see through the smears better than ours can.

Hriday's picture

Little'Baroness' Warsi has the cheek to criticise Ed Miliband's election, when she is an unelected peer in the House of Lords.She failed miserably to get elected as a MP.Perhaps Ed Miliband should push hard to get the unelected house of Lords abolished. It should be replaced by elected members.We wouldn't have ,then, to put up with the likes of Warsi.

Dave's picture

It's much more important to get the backing of the MPs than the trade unionists (look how Brown suffered at the hands of the PLP). Unlike trade unionists, MPs have the power of political life or death over a leader, and in my opinion this should be accounted for more strongly in the electoral college.

Lorraine's picture

But Joseph, 7 million, out of the 8,609,527 who voted for Labour in the general election (total votes cast 29,691,380) is rather more than a third isn't it?

William's picture

@Joseph A
25 September 2010 at 21:24

"I'm sorry but 7 million people out of the 60 million people that make up the population doesn't impress me. More people voted in the x factor finals last year."

Well lets be fair, I don't think those demographics overlap. It may just be total prejudice on my part, but I suspect that people who ring-in to vote on the XFactor or BigBrother don't vote in general elections. Sorry, it may just be prejudice on my part.

I'm just relieved that I won't have to pick between one of the Three Little Blairs at the next election: David Blair, Nick Blair, or David Blair.

Finally we can vote for a non-clone, and begin to bust that man's myth.

Well done Ed.

Tom's picture

We have a leader who isnt a centre ground , middle class vote grabber and not a man who is in hock to News International . I.e we have a man who doesnt play the modern political game and the right are in paroxisms already about it , To all Conservitives who are happy about "Red Ed" let me remind you , your man Cameron could barely defeat the most umpopular Prime Minister ever.

Sheila's picture

@Arthur Williamson, yes it is a complete disaster.

This move has enabled the Lib Dems to claim the centre-left ground and mark my words, they will be the second party.

Lou's picture

It's worthwhile remembering that Blair got a 52% vote from the Affiliated section when he became leader. The affiliated vote did not matter as he had unanimous support in the other two thirds. However, it's also worth noting that there was a smaller number of candidates standing against Blair - Prescott and Beckett. Kinnock only stood against Hattersley and John Smith only had Bryan Gould against him.

This leadership campaign had more candidates so therefore it was never going to be an outright anointment as with Blair. Kinnock, Smith from the MPs or the party members.

Sam's picture

Ed Miliband will have to reach out to people in the £20,000 - £30,000 bracket, and they're the section of society that is shown by polls at least, to be the most anti-Labour as they were financially squeezed the most in the last 13 years and feel they have had a bad deal from public services.

Ed Miliband really has a lot work to do to connect with the south of England, the east and the midlands. If he's to do this he needs to shelve statism, give people more freedom and responsibility and not treat their hard earned money as his own piggy bank.

Clem the Gem's picture

This is a big step forward for Labour, and we have a leader we can unite with. Ed "speaks human", which very many at Westminster don't, and will be able to reconnect with our lost voters.
Interesting to note criticism coming from the unelected Baroness Warsi and therightwing media.

Mrs.Josephine Hyde-Hartley's picture

Perhaps Baroness Warsi should mind her own business - If 7 million people had voted for me I shouldn't be overly concerned about any members of Parliament. Surely they'll be practically falling over themselves to help the new leader. Have they elected a decent whip yet one wonders?

Loftytom's picture

Superb. It's 1980 all over again.
The conservatives made the same mistake with IDS.

You win elections by grabbing the centre, not bigging up your core vote.

See also Tea Party / GOP

Zole's picture

Sorry, Sheila ?

Electing Centre-Left Ed enables "the Lib Dems to claim the centre-left ground..." ?!!!

And presumably electing Blairite Dave would have forced the Lib Dems to the centre-right ?!!!

Extraordinary reasoning.

CrISpY DuCk's picture

By not playing their bloody game and tackling the likes of Murdoch head on.

At the beginning of the 20th century surveys showed that 25% of the population were living in poverty. They found that at least 15% were living at subsistence level. They had just enough money for food, rent, fuel and clothes. They could not afford 'luxuries' such as newspapers or public transport. About 10% were living in below subsistence level and could not afford an adequate diet.

The surveys found that the main cause of poverty was low wages. The main cause of extreme poverty was the loss of the main breadwinner. If dad was dead, ill or unemployed it was a disaster. Mum might get a job but women were paid much lower wages than men.

How the Labour Party began

The Labour Party was created in 1900: a new party for a new century. Its formation was the result of many years of hard effort by working people, trade unionists and socialists, united by the goal of changing the British Parliament to represent the interests of everybody. Ignored by the Tories and disillusioned with the Liberals, a coalition of different interests came together to push for change at a Conference on Labour Representation in London's Memorial Hall in February 1900.

This history of the Labour Party celebrates our achievements from its emergence in 1900 as a parliamentary pressure group. We are right to regard as historic the establishment of the National Health Service, the enshrining in law of equality of opportunity for all and the creation and maintenance of an empowering welfare state – all Labour achievements.

The party grew out of the trade union movement and socialist political parties of the 19th century seeking representation for workers.

If being a red means having the common decency of a normal human being then Ed should shout it from the rooftops.RED AND PROUD

Unlike this lot

* Topshop owner Green's £1.2 billion dividend was enough to double the salaries of Cambodian's whole garment workforce for eight years.
* A worker making clothes for Green's Arcadia group in Mauritius would need to toil for almost 4,000 years to gain the £3 million model Kate Moss earned for her Topshop clothing range.
* The £4.6 million in salary and bonuses for Tesco's chief executive Sir Terry Leahy could pay the annual wages of more than 25,000 Bangladeshi garment employees who supply its stores, based on average wages of about £15 a month.
* Coleen McLoughlin, the fiancée of footballer Wayne Rooney, collected a reported £1.5 million as a spokesmodel for George at Asda - clothes made in Bangladesh for five pence an hour. Coleen's £3000 Hermes Birkin handbag cost more than a Bangladeshi garment employee could earn in 16 years.
* The £2.3 million in salary and bonuses for M&S chief executive Stuart Rose would pay the annual wages of almost 12,000 Sri Lankan garment workers.

I bet RED and UNION are dirty words in that part of the world too.

CrISpY DuCk's picture

@ Arthur

So Arthur you'd like the Unions to sit back and do nothing to protect the jobs of their members because it was obviously the union members who caused a world wide recession and it's only right that they should pay with their jobs/homes etc etc.How dare they have the temerity to complain and have the damn cheek to suggest that those poor souls who are the wealthiest in our society should shoulder more of the burden.
Is there anything you find indecent or just plain wrong about the position of the unions as I'm struggling to understand why you want to distance yourself from their position.

Is Tony Woodley evil for saying "David Cameron and his millionaire cabinet will not be among those hurt by pay freezes, benefit reductions and an estimated 1.2 million job losses that will follow. But this Con-Dem government, particularly the Liberals, has no political mandate for the assassination of our public services with their savage cuts and privatisation of our NHS.

"And these cuts won't limit their harm to the public sector: construction workers are losing their jobs with the schools project cancelled; transport will be hit with local funding cuts; and manufacturing jobs will go as government procurement dries up.

"But it does not have to be as painful as this. A tax avoidance drive would bring in £25 billion and a Robin Hood Tax on the banks would bring in £125 billion worldwide. More work for more people means more taxes - it is a no brainer."

Bill Fraser's picture

Red Ed or Harriet Harman?

'New Generation Labour' or old tired
nanny state 'New Labour'?

Think the choice is obvious, however it is a pity that Ed did not get
the fulsome support of the PLP an
party membership, but had to rely
on the Union vote.

Latest tweets