Keeping the riots in proportion
What these exceptional events mean, and do not mean.
By David Allen Green Published 09 August 2011 11:10
So the riots have continued for a third evening. However, in terms of overall crime figures in the communities directly affected, they are unlikely to be statistically significant. Nationally, the criminality of the riots may register as no more than a blip.
This is not to be callous about the vile lawlessness of what has happened in Tottenham, Ealing, and elsewhere. The pictures of burned out cars and looted shops are real enough. But one main difference between the current riots and the on-going criminality in urban environments is its concentration under an attentive media glare. Nonetheless, every day in every town, people lose their possessions and their businesses because of casual crime, and this is rarely reported on by the media.
Whatever the significance of the recent riots, it is not that there has been an explosion of crime. If crime figures are an index of a broken society, then society this month will not be that much more broken than last month, or next month.
What is important is the nature of the current criminality and the assumptions that it unsettles. For any sensible person living in a city these riots are frightening. Instead of urban crime being a background buzz which, unless one is unlucky, is something which happens to other people, these riots appear to present an immediate and disconcerting threat for two reasons.
First, one can readily imagine the disorder and attendant violence happening in one's own street or shopping centre: if it can happen in Enfield, it can really happen in any suburb. In an instant, every suburb seems potentially unsafe.
Second, the fact that these riots even occurred indicates the apparent impotence of the police. There was no one there to stop it happening or to make it go away. This adds a stark sense of further vulnerability to the feeling that public and private places are now inherently unsafe.
The psychological impact of the riots is that criminality is something which now could happen to you in any part of a city. And these rioters are not the noble protesters who pose for pictures whilst swinging from war memorials; they are instead criminals as likely to beat up a press photographer as a rival gang member. What was somebody else's problem is now a mob that seems willing and able to strike randomly.
What this in turn will mean is that there will be calls for more policing, and far more police powers. People's fears will need to be allayed by gestures; everyone will need to feel safe again. A liberal approach to law and order will now seem to many as simply inappropriate and misconceived. But there is no good reason to introduce water cannon and rubber bullets. Indeed, in seemingly exceptional times, it is more important to adhere to the rule of law and the normal exercise of police powers.
There may be another riot tonight, or there may be calm. There may be another bout of looting, or there may be preventative police action. But when these riots are over, this new sense of fear may well remain. Society will not have broken, at least not in any objective manner; but people's confidence that things will always be alright for them in their daily urban lives could perhaps be broken instead.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















35 comments
What these riots do mean is that PC 'non confrontational' policing like we saw in Tottenham is not working.
The police response has got to be more aggressive with water cannons, rubber bullets and the army if necessary.
Critics say this will inflame the situation....the situation is already inflamed!!
A better title for this article:
'What these exceptional events mean, and do not mean to me'. To me (Martin)
they have a different significance!
This PC 'non confrontational' policing may be in their favour when discussions about the cuts facing the Police are mentioned next.
Also why kettle students aggressively then let looters loot away?
@a. cole
My only concern is that such action will set a precedent for similar action in future legitimate protest, such as the student protests.
@ A.Cole
The situation may already be inflamed, but one does not connect a fireman's hose to a petrol pump.
@Gwyn; in the past 30 years the wealth hasn't been transferred, the wealth has grown as a result of an increase in GDP. All people in all social classes have seen an increase in their actual wealth. Take a look at the number of people who own cars, washing machines, computers, mobile phones, colour TVs etc today in comparison to 30 years ago and you'll see that every class has benefitted from the increase in wealth. Many people are actually owners of capital through their pension funds .. you are probably one of these people. Pension funds are the biggest holders of global shares and bonds. In short the workers own the capital.
You are living in the past Gwyn Williams, take off your anorak, your silly Trotsky googles and get with it.
I suspect it's a lot easier to be a lawyer than a policeman at times like this. For that matter, it's a great deal easier to leave comments on NewStatesman blogs...
Anyway, in short, those that have the difficult jobs are the ones faced with the immediate consequences - the dispossessed, the police, fireman, shopkeepers and, dare I say, the families of some of these out-of-control youths.
Even as the loyal opposition (I am a church minister) I find your posts insightful and challenging.
This however seems more an apologetics to liberalism than anything else.
Don't know if you have seen the Adam Curtis short "oh dearism" as it seems this is an oh dearism moment for the liberal middle class. It is obvious we need reform in the police but equally obvious we need to portray a sence of strong policing.
Addressing the problems with the police leads to a confidence crisis among the police.
Add to the powder keg a fatherless , aimless generation and a society which places more value on things rather than people and you realise for all the blogs and commentary today there is no easy or quick solution
And as Mr Curtis concludes in his short film all we can do is look on and say "oh dear"
People are not blind. They see criminality on a grand scale at the top with enormous amount of tax avoidance.There is a culture here and not just in Greece, which is well established of Tax avoidance on a grand scale with very little expectation that those involved will be prosecuted. http://www.lifeinsurancehq.org/
A rioter just walked out of Highbury Magistrates Court...he WORKS in a primary school.
So much for the lefty poverty, no opportunity apologist argument!
It really annoys me the way the term "youth" is used to describe anyone who is disorderly. These people are not "youths" they are young men, from what i can see mostly in their early 20s. Youths refers mostly to teenagers, who get a bad enough press as it is, without people turning the very word that identifies them into a word with negative connontations. These are mostly young men, who dare i say it seem to come from the coloured communities. Please don't tarnish the nations youngsters with the same brush. People are now talking about problems with all young people, the way they were raised etc. This is not the problem here.
I'm all about the pragmatics, me. If water cannon aren't a magic cure-all on the wide avenues & in the open spaces of the french banlieux, they certainly won't work in the narrow, twisty streets of London.
There are all kinds of ordinary people caught behind police lines at various points in these riots. Which of them shall we accidentally kill with a baton round or blind with a water cannon? Shall we call such mishaps "collateral damage"? Which rioter shall we accidentally transmogrify into a martyr & victim?
The law of unintended consequence is at its strongest when people are more concerned that "something should be done" than that something effective be done.
Mr Devine, or whatever your name is. You evidently have not read The Spirit Level, a reasonabel analysis of the consequences of growing income inequality. But that´s fine. If you are happy to live in the kind of self obsessed, individualistic society and that the middle classes have created in Britain over the last 30 years, good luck to you.
At the end of the day the Police are only ordinary human beings even though they have special powers of arrest and detention. There is only so much they can do, and they can only police with the consent of 'the people' and withe co-operation of the people. So I don't blame them for not intervening when buildings are ablaze. After all its only property, although it is ordinary hard working peoples livlihoods at stake.
What we ow need is a curfew on younsters An appeal to parents is useless because parents themselves are helpless to deal with their ferral kids, because they indulged them and are to blame for their subsequent behaviour.
'Don't know if you have seen the Adam Curtis short "oh dearism" as it seems this is an oh dearism moment for the liberal middle class. '
Not really, as that piece was about complex political narratives and how they haven't been reported correctly by global media.
This seems to be about: short supply/high price of crack cocaine; prevalence of methane; PC gangsterism/media-savvy hacktivism; policing methods overwhelmed by the war of(!) drugs.
Several senior police spokespeople have described this series of London riots as 'naked criminality"!
Surely the political right should be relieved that these mini-riots highlight the fact that most rioters are consumers at heart.
The conservatives, monarchists, liberals and democrats should be thankful these unruly crowds are not 'politically driven'.
These rowdies could not even be described as 'focus' groups.
Zombieland
While I do accept that crimes committed during the riots of the last few nights may be statistical blips what the real long term affect will be is to reinforce feeling in places like Peckham that during the summer young people are out of control. Every summer there are clashes between small numbers of local youth and with those from places such as Lewisham and other local areas which make people pre-judge the young here. Recent events will just divide local people further and the number of young people without older role models, guidance and a sense of belonging will grow leading to events like we have seen lately more likely.
"the fact that these riots even occurred indicates the apparent impotence of the police. There was no one there to stop it happening or to make it go away."
Or the deliberate impotence of the police. Is it not conceivable that by standing idly by, and by getting the world's media to focus on this issue, that the police will ask for an increase in pay and an increase in numbers? Is it not possible that they are allowing these riots to take place because it reinforces are dependence on them and puts pressure on politicians to make sure that they are spared from the cuts to the public sector? Is there not a more strategic reason for why the police have not clamped down on these protests?
I would also argue that there were enough police present to stop this from happening but that they, of their own accord, decided not to engage with protestors. This strikes me as odd especially as the police kettled student protestors and - in one incident - nearly killed a protestor (Alfie Meadows). Most of these protestors were peaceful. As I recall one was removed from his wheelchair by police officers for no other reason than that he was protesting an increase in tuition fees. Rioters can get away with whatever they wish; but peaceful protestors! Well, they must be beaten to a pulp!
A case of screwed up priorities, it appears.
I wonder how many of the moaning minnies actually wrote to their MPs and councillors objecting to the cuts in police and armed forces budgets but instead rubbed their hands with glee that their council tax didn't rise?. Chickens, home and roost comes to mind
Where have all the role models gone? What do you expect when Labour MPs and others were grabbing as much money as possible in so called expenses. There were others involved from the other parties but it matters more when Labour embezzle, because they were supposed to represent ordinary people and poor people.
Then you have top policemen involved in accepting corrupt payments.
Then you have conspicuous consumption in areas like Clapham and Islington, where the very rich and Trendy live cheek and jowl with people who have very little.Been there, seen it, felt the anger and resentment.
Then, you have a government whose agenda is to launch a virulent attack on the poor and those on welfare benefits.
Reminds you a bit about the early days of the Thatcher Government, when they were so confident and they had an agenda that was anti-trade union and many perceived as consisting of an open attack on the poor.
As night follows day, pretty soon, young people who do not live a vacuum decided to give an expression to their anger.
Do not jump up and shout that this is just an excuse for what happened.
More, an attempt to analyse why we are at this point.
Labour looked after the bankers very well. They ensured that individuals walked away with huge bonuses for failure.
The head of the UKBA, where there were ROOMS full of unopened post for weeks on end received a huge bonus for failure.
People are not blind. They see criminality on a grand scale at the top with enormous amount of tax avoidance.There is a culture here and not just in Greece, which is well established of Tax avoidance on a grand scale with very little expectation that those involved will be prosecuted.
EMA has gone.Prospects look bleak.Anyone can see that the Rich look after their ill-gotten gains and this government looks after the Rich.
Expect more of the same from them and worse.
Labour has given up hope and given in to the law and order brigade.Or they have cosied up to the racists and have shared values with the anti-immigrant brigade.
Socialism has long been a dirty word for them.
Violence is not a solution, but for a whole lot of reasons,the disaffected and disenfranchised have resorted to it in Egypt,Tunisia and France and probably will in other parts of Europe.
People do have to be completely penniless to feel resentment and be aware of the unfairness of it all. In fact, the totally penniless are too absorbed in existing to be bothered to riot.
This blog post is so bad I can't even be bothered to slag it off.
Sorry, But a typo crept in at the end.It should read, People do NOT have to be completely penniless...
@ Disqualifier.
yes it;s strange how in some instances where a swift police intervention was safely workable, they sat by watching looting... politics at work by chance (nonono cries the left, never- it's the Tory cutters) er... but i watched 6 coppers stand there as a kid walsks by with a telly, i mean I saw it (nonono protests the left, u don't understand how policing works, or you're blind- In the last 15 years we (Livingston)hired an EXTRA 7000 coppers so that they could deal with the paperwork we (Brown) created that requires an 10,000 coppers and 3000 extra civil servants and...) YES YES,i said, though, that the copper could have nicked that kid , right? all i'm saying is blatently if the policeman had walked forward 10 steps and extended his arm, then said'you're nicked', the kid would, er.. would have been nicked. That's all i'm saying, not all of it was like that, but a lot of it. (leftie sighs shaking his head...'you don't get it do u , faschist property owning/loving pig. we have human rights and were the kid to be nicked, as you so rudely suggest(what about his rights to be fairly described- he's not guilty till proven so. he may have been carrying a telly but had the policeman enquired as to wheter he was ALSO carryinfg a receipt for the telly, eh? did he?I think that the tax funded lawyers will have something to say about that you nazi!! any way, he has human rights, and to ensure that they are never violated, 3 coppers take him down the nick, the third making sure the other 2 don't beat him up, where a booking sergeant does the paper work, another copper preparing his party bag for when he's packed off home later- THAT, you scum pig tory cutter, is the mark of a civilsed society, and not some bizarre notions of self-knowledge or consciousness or compassion) Wow, I get it now. Arresting them means all the police have to come off the streets, so we don't arrest anyone. hang on though, dodn't that newspaper guy get taken out? Tomlinson(the lefty shrugs, unable to answer- for a split second he feels a buzz in his head, his synapses are trying to forge a new pathway, but years of training at the Academy of Clowning and Advanced Buffonery(this was funded by an EU grant incidentally)kicks in, and he reverts to type, positing what needs to be done to save society from itself: Clearly we need more money to fund some research into how we got here, 2)fund some research into what to do next, 3) fund some more coppers, 4) fund some more civil servants to help the coppers,5) fund some more lawyers to ensure that the cicl rights of the looters not be beached-AND in case anyone accuses the left of false fiscal accounting, we will fund the lawyers for the looters by decreasing the fund to assist the small business owners, and if need be just increase their business rates the capitalists should pay their dues it's about time. And the guys who go bust as result can go and get one of the 'alledged' jobs the rioters are being told to get...we will also have to fund extra extra policemen becuse only using 3 coppers to take a 15 year old down the nick in a £50, 000 armoured van is dangerous- what if the 3rd copper, who is meant to be ensuring the other 2 coppers don't beat him up secretly, actually wants to beat the kid up? Of course, we would need to get funding to fund the original funding i.e. service the original debts- clowns don't see a problem in that and indeed, Ponzi was one of the great clowns often cited in their lecture theater at the Circus Maximus
@ Wayne Gough
Well written. I fully agree with your comments.
One fact that I can't seem to shake off is that in the Greek riots the teenagers attacked the banks. Here, they attack JJB sports, currys, Kentucky fried chicken and designer outfitters. Very strange and one for the social scientist to ponder.
@ Disqualifier
Don't forget the protest that took place a little while before by the church and Trade Unions where the Police managed to kill Ian Tomlinson. His crime was to walk home. I seem to recall that those peaceful protesters were kettled and inflamed for marching peacefully. The banks managed to riot with everyone's money but that was called business, oh and so was the MP's expeses, wasn't that a riot of the public purse? Just goes to show.
It seems to me that what is really needed is for huge efforts to be made in some of our most deprived areas. It would take co-ordinated efforts by law enforcement, education and social services professionals to confront the culture that has become ingrained in these areas. The tabloids will hate the cost, but in crimes prevented and economic lives created it would be a huge benefit for us all.
@ Matty- agreed. Fiendishly complex paperwork designed to keep people in non-jobs means that the truly neady in our society don't get the help they deserve whilst the morons get more 'entitled'- sick right?
@ Gwynn; you write;"along with the progressive impoverishment of the majority"
Statements like this is why I have started writing age 42- what are you talking about- Do you know what poverty is? Go to an old people's home and talk to them, seriously they like that, just have a cup of tea with them, please do that... watch the international news, or buy an international affairs mag- I' tired of hearing it- I have problems, major ones, fundamentally important ones, and I feel there's a growing realisation by people like me in society that we've had enough of BLATENT INCORRECT STATEMENTS, which are then used as a foundation of some elaborate thesis, forgetting the foundations are rotten. No wonder there is no decent affordable social housing after 14 years of labour, they understand nothing of building- be it a house, argument, school(one that teaches, not a shiny new one), society, armed force, reserve, pension, infrastucture, postoffice, nothing... you're progressive impoverishment of the majority? pffff!! More like another minority group that a generation of MP's has used to get more POWER...
David Allen Green wrote the other day about people changing their minds- well i changed mine after a few days of these riots- yes, seemingly it's bought under control, but guess what, it can start again in a flash, and if the louts come banging on my door, I have only a 3 year old boy to help defend the house and the 3 females in it, cos the police will be snowed when the rioters kick off cos some other piece of free money has neen taken away- and u guessed it, business is going to rank way higher than my problems in the world where big business is King.Nero, burned, fiddled, Rome , while.Could the Lefties start practicing building please??
@ Simon
The problem has nothing to do with a lack of a co-ordinated effort because there is. It has more to do with the fact that in general the same people get the same help over and over again without any real sense of progress but does create a sense of entitlement, which breeds absolute morons.On the other side of the same coin there people who have real and desperate need, such as abuse within the family or a family that cares for someone with a mental health but are largely ignored and left to drown. The only difference is, as any trained social worker can tell you, the latter can be "contained".
If you look at a country like dubai, they sell 24 carat gold worth thousands of pounds in open markets - no one would dare steal this.
it breaks my heart to see all these small business owners around west bromwich, wolverhampton being targeted.
the police need to get tough - the way the yobs are using social networks in order to organise violence needs to be addressed - especially in relation to blackberry messenger.
the yobs are quite smart they've worked out that the police are powerless if there is a large group of them and they are using social media to organise looting - they've realised they can get away with it which is encouraging even more youths - this is out of control.
at the same time hearing that there is 50-70 youths whi have had enough of the yobs and are self policing enfield.
@gwynn: u write" If you are happy to live in the kind of self obsessed, individualistic society and that the middle classes have created in Britain "
the middle classes didn't create squat- they went along with it, gurglin wine at dinner parties talking about property prices.
it's the top guys who mould our society, that's the truth- and in the last 13 years, that means those Labour idiots, who were meant to represent the people... well, some should be in prison.Shaheed u right, they are turncoats. People are calling for heads to roll cos tories went on holiday?- so we going to ban holiday now are we? I've had to cancel mine next week and it's pissed me off, was so looking forward to what the urchins might come up with... what a crass, opprtunistic level of argument, to attack a family holiday.
Oh hang on leftist brothers, why not blame osborne for baby P, the toddler who finally died of a broken back and after doctors had told the social workers SO MANY TIMES there wre problems- 60 visits and no one spotted that the poor, lonely child , unloved and abused , that's all he knew iN his short sad life... u effing moronic tossers... the 100 civil servants that can be placed between Osborne and the child, and your HATRED leads u to one inescapable conclusion- osborne's fault, and pay off the boss- actually she got to sue didn't she?, unfairly dismissed-- that's right, balls coudn't even sack someon properly, he was so keen to get the public sympathy vote, and the disgusting courts, the other tool in the insidious machinery that is designed to undermine the family unit, says she can claim for £2.5 mn. £2.5 million for allowing a toddler to be systematically beaten to death for 2 years, under her own eyes. Civilised society? compared to what? an effing gulag perhaps... Poor rioters and their prospects? F OFF. More money for the lawyers, judge, system, social workers. F OFF.
This is truly a nation that loves not it's children and so it has no future... it loves power and money, and will write and say anything to get it. It condescendingly STILL looks on at the 'other' countries in the world, content that its underclass is one of the smallest. SO WHAT?? it loves not its own children, it loves not itself.
THE LIONHEART IS DEAD.
The idiots in the street? they're the prisoners off tomorrow, that's all..there is ALWAYS a fringe, and it is a trick of the mind and its ever attendant ego to think SOCIETY can fix it... we can only HELP the following generation though if we put our minds to it now. After all, the prison wardens need a job too. Plato wrote 2500 YEARS ago about how to fix this, and his principles would apply today, so if u really want to fix the riots...
Yes mr Allen Green -I've changed my mind since the beginning of these lootings. i have bigger fish to fry then worrying about the looters. Don't really care what it takes to clear the streets, seriously, i'm not bovvered-I'll pay for it, just get it done
What has happened to our youths and why no respect !
For many years now the United Kingdon has been at war with Iraq, Afghanistan and now Libya. We have been exposed to death and destruction almost on a daily basis and told that this is necessary. War has become the norm !
We have been through a WorldWide Financial Crisis due to Banks and Financial Institutions greed and wrong doing. The Banks and Financial Institutions brought the world to it's knee's. The Tax Payer has bailed out the Banks and we have seen them rewarded with bonuses for their failure whilst the Tax payer picks up the pieces. Talk about rubbing salt into a wound.
We have seen the MP's and Politicians expenses scandal that was epidemic and saw them use their clever little loopholes and excuses to get out of it, sorry mistake, misunderstanding, administration error and all the other lies. Only a handful of them made went to a court of law.
During the last electoral campaign we saw David Cameron live on television say that a country is judge upon how it cares for it's most vulnerable in society and if you are Sick, Disabled, frail, vulnerable or the poorest in society you have nothing to fear because he would protect that group of people if he becomes Prime-Minister. That turned out to be lies.
David Cameron also said that the Tories had no intention of raising VAT if elected and within one week of getting into Downing Street raised VAT, yet more lies.
David Cameron promised to financially ring fence and protect the National Health Service only but once in Downing Street we were told that they had a secret Agenda and had lied to the entire Nation during the election campaign and were in fact going to Break Up and Privatise the National Health Service all along. Yet another Bare Face Lie from our Prime-Minister.
Then you had the Phone Hacking scandal that involved close friends and associates of David Cameron.David Cameron employed his good friend Andy Culson even though he knew that Culson was implicated in crime and Cameron went on to protect that accused person. Cameron dragged his feet throughout the whole affair. We then witnessed accusations of Police corruption and saw a string of high ranking Police Officers resign along with others. We witnessed the Murdochs get treated like royalty without getting arrested but welcomed to a sellect committee and not arrested like the odinary person in the street. No wonder people are sick to the teeth.
We see David Cameron embark on another escapade to fight other peoples civil war in Libya even though the United Kingdom has a deficit and no money in the pot. This Government expects the citizens of the United Kingdom to suffer deep and painful cutbacks and the loss of jobs and to work to an old age whilst they find the money to finance other peoples civil war in a far away land causing more death and destruction. Money for war but not our poor !
So why are these Politicians scratching their heads wondering why peope have no respect anymore and are extremely angry.
Our young have been exposed to war over many years, they have suffered the effects of bankers/financial institutions greed & wrong doing and rewarded for it with bonuses whilst we suffer,they have seen wealthy Politicians cheat the system for greed,they have been lied to and deceived by David Cameron on many issues, they have seen an accused friend of Camerons get a top job in the highest office in this land even though it was common knowledge that Culson was implicated in crime,they have seen/heard about police corruption and the list goes on and on and on and on.
This entire situation is more than one man being shoot by the Police, it is far deeper than that and the Politicians do not want to face the truth that society is fragmented and they are also to blame. You cannot respect Authority if it is dishonest, deceitful, hypocrital and constantly lies to the people. We must also get away from this continious cycle of wars that exposes our children to death and destruction on a daily basis that is almost glorified and accepted as the norn. Cameron must recognize that even though the rioting is completely wrong they are also the victims of our fragmented and deceitful society.
Bang on about this not being a spike in the number of crimes comitted, they're just being focused under the media spotlight. From where I'm sat the danger is that ignoring the causes of these problems will mean that when the riots are stamped out (probably through force) those involved will just skulk back to their ghettos and continue to make lives miserable for people on a low-key level for the forseeable future (emboldened by having evaded justice here).
Anton Jury
Bravo, someone needed to say it. For 30 years, we have watched wealth being transferred from the majority to the owners of capital and the upper middle class, along with the progressive impoverishment of the majority and the alientaion of what was once the working class, now described as the underclass.
In the seventies, I recall reading Global Reach, a book about the growing power of international capital and corporations: i.e. globalisation. The authors predicted what they described as the progressive latinamericanisation of western capitalist society: i.e. the rich enclosed in their mansions and gated communities, behind private armed guards and CCTV, while the the state security apparatus confronts the masses with tear gas, water canon and, inevitably, lethal fire power, in the streets and plazas. This is what our cretinous politicians and elites have created for us, all in the name of liberal democracy.