Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Polling
7 October 2021

Keir Starmer’s conference speech polled better than Boris Johnson’s – but does it matter?

In focus groups shown the speeches, Starmer came out on top for content, agreeableness, and perceptions of competence.

By Ben Walker

When Gordon Brown took to the stage for his first conference speech as prime minister in September 2007, the Labour party was enjoying leads of ten, 11 and 13 percentage points in the polls. His party, and the nation’s media, were anticipating a snap general election – a November mandate for New Labour’s fresh Brownite agenda. Brown himself failed to curb expectations. He allowed the rumours circulate, and so the hype continued to build.

By the time Brown ruled out a snap election, David Cameron and the Conservatives had snatched the agenda, gifting the cameras a rousing performance at their Blackpool conference, where the shadow leader challenged Brown to a snap election. The Tories sought to capitalise on the issue about which the media and country were obsessing, and benefitted accordingly. As activists departed the northern city for their constituencies, Labour’s lead had all but vanished. This was a conference season and a “bottling” from a prime minister that pushed the polls and moved perceptions.

This year’s conference season comes at a time when the Conservative lead over Labour is clear, but brittle. Built on voters who have previously declared uncertainty about staying with the Conservatives, the Tory lead is not set in stone, and the events of both conventions could change things.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

Polling by Opinium has found that Keir Starmer’s speech went down better with voters than Boris Johnson’s.

The focus group were shown clips selected by the broadcasters of the two speeches, and Starmer’s came out on top for content, agreeableness, and perceptions of competence.

While Johnson’s speech was heralded as one of the best he’s ever delivered, more voters felt he had come across as out of touch (45 per cent) than Starmer (29 per cent) did.

In addition, more of the focus group felt that Starmer showed he cared about ordinary people (68 per cent) than Johnson (46 per cent), and thought Starmer showed competence (62 per cent) compared to Johnson (just 49 per cent).

In terms of how the focus group responded to the speeches (or, at least, clips of the speeches), Starmer won. But is that enough?

Content from our partners
Why modelling matters: its role in future healthcare challenges
Helping children be safer, smarter, happier internet explorers
Power to the people

This year’s conference season has been overshadowed by news of the developing petrol crisis. An issue that Starmer was criticised for not confronting enough in his conference speech.

In 2007, Cameron gave his party a boost in the polls because he seized the political agenda, because he talked about the issues voters were noticing. Did Starmer do the same?

Topics in this article: , ,