Support 100 years of independent journalism.

The blockchain bubble wants to sell you a very expensive watch

You can’t see it, you can’t wear it, you can’t use it to tell the time, you have to share it with hundreds of other people. Opening bids please!

By The Chatterer

Since 1996, the Swiss watchmaker Patek Philippe has told its customers: “You never really own a Patek Philippe. You merely look after it for the next generation.”  

This is one of the most brilliant lines in advertising, because it takes the unbelievably vain act of spending a five-figure sum on a watch that tells the time as well as a £20 Casio, and says: don’t worry, big fella. You’re doing this because you’re a Great Dad. It’s not jewellery – it’s a responsibility you’re taking on for your family. You did good champ! 

Of course, the real value of such an investment is in having people notice your expensive watch and not you, and especially not the echoing void where your personality should be. But what if your family pester you to invest in other, less flash assets, such as food? 

Fear not. There’s a whole new way to not really own a Patek Philippe: the blockchain, of course! In an auction beginning at 5pm on 18 November, SM-ART, a platform that trades in non-fungible tokens (NFT) and non-fungible assets (NFA), is selling a Patek Philippe Nautilus, which the owner considers to be worth $120,000, to 920 lucky buyers all at once.  

So, to be clear: this is an auction to pay real money for a thousandth of a watch that someone else bought six years ago in Dubai, and which is now in storage. No, you don’t get to wear it.  

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

This is a long way from being the stupidest NFT. You can spend $1.7m on a picture of a rock someone took off a free clipart website if you want.  

However, it does come with terms and conditions that caught the Chatterer’s eye, especially: “The co-owners of an artwork are not entitled to take any decisions concerning the exit of said artwork.” By “exit”, they mean “the sale of a co-owned artwork”, in which “all the shareowners are proportionally liquidated”. 

Content from our partners
Transport is the core of levelling up
The forgotten crisis: How businesses can boost biodiversity
Small businesses can be the backbone of our national recovery

So technically SM-ART, or whoever they appoint as “manager” of the watch (fractional owners don’t get a say in that either), could decide to sell it for, say, £10 rather than $120,000, making each fraction worth a nice round 1p.  

Right now there is no suggestion this would happen, and every chance those fractions will go up in price, because people are paying huge sums for NFTs at the moment – money no longer seems real, people are piling money into technical and financial innovations they don’t fully understand and when has that ever gone wrong?