Amid the furore over Rupert Murdoch possibly axing page 3, a key issue has been left unexplored. Without page 3 how can they print page 4?
I would argue that axing page 3 would rapidly lead to an abolition of both. And if our national broadsheets start skipping straight from page 2 to page 5, what kind of message does this send our children, some of whom are still learning to count?
Page 3 may have become “anachronistic” or “obvious” to Murdoch critics, but there are still some traditionalists out there who think we shouldn’t try to fix what’s not broken – let’s not forget that 2 has been followed by 3 since The Sun was founded, if not before. It’s simply the natural order of things. And as someone who has actually been 3, I for one applaud the “freshness” and “youth” that the number has come to be associated with.
The possible move has been further criticised by some as a sly bid by Murdoch to save on paper and printing ink. But many other publications have been doing the same for quite some time – The Sun, for example, has been systematically stripping all quality content from its pages for the last 20 years, and none of its readers have noticed.
Content from our partners
Related
Join the debate
Subscribe here to comment