Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Culture
  2. TV & Radio
7 January 2019updated 03 Aug 2021 11:15am

Why isn’t Jodie Whittaker’s Doctor Who the lead character in her own damn show?

The impression you’re left with is that showrunner Chris Chibnall is simply more interested in his male characters than his female ones.

By Jonn Elledge

We’re 11 episodes into showrunner Chris Chibnall’s new regime at Doctor Who now – a complete season, plus the New Year’s special – and I’ve realised that there’s something bugging me.

Actually, there are quite a lot of things bugging me: the endless telling not showing; the complete lack of subplots; the scenes with so many characters in that they look like a publicity shot of the Polyphonic Spree; the dialogue so on the nose that it makes you sneeze. But most of those are obvious, and they’ve been there all along, and either they bother you or they don’t, and if they don’t fair enough. Lucky you. There’s another, though, that it took me an embarrassingly long time to spot – although, in my defence, it is hidden behind both the blizzard of pre-season publicity and the single best thing about the entire season.

Publicity first. The most obvious way in which the series changed this year – certainly the most obvious to normals – was the fact that, for the first time, it had a female lead. The decision to cast Jodie Whittaker as the 13th Doctor was the first thing we knew about Chibnall’s take on the show, and for obvious reasons it got a lot of publicity. Most of this – despite the inevitable warnings from pink-faced men in their 50s who have never really gotten over the fact that Tom Baker doesn’t love them any more that they were now planning to boycott the show – was incredibly positive.

So: that was good. There was some disquiet when rumours appeared that the companion was going to be played by Bradley Walsh, as if the decision to cast a female Doctor needed to be balanced by casting a middle-aged bloke in the part normally reserved for young women. But then he turned out to be just one of three companions, and the show has a long history of getting light-ent types to act, and if Billie Piper, Catherine Tate and Matt Lucas were all brilliant, why not the bloke who presents The Chase?

And lo, it came to pass that when the show was broadcast Walsh’s performance as widower Graham O’Brien turned out to be really bloody good. Many of the series’s best moments involved him acting in exactly the sort of understated way you wouldn’t expect from a gameshow host, and the main arc this season has concerned his attempts to be a father figure to his step-grandson Ryan (Tosin Cole), who is determined to have precisely none of it. The moment in episode four when Ryan is finally about to say something nice to Graham, only he doesn’t get round to it because the latter has just noticed there’s a spider the size of a van on the ceiling, was a) a really lovely moment that b) you couldn’t get on any other show because c) massive bloody spider.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A weekly round-up of The New Statesman's climate, environment and sustainability content. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

But it’s within the rather sweet, gradual thaw in this relationship that lies the problem. Because you might notice something about the storyline I just described: it’s about two men. What’s more, it’s a story that only happens at all because a female character dies, pointlessly, in episode one. It’s an example of the trope known as “fridging”, in which horrible things happen to a woman, largely to kick off a storyline about a man.

And this is what’s bugging me. Despite being the ostensible lead, Whittaker was given no material as meaty Walsh or Cole. This may have been a conscious choice to de-centre the Doctor a bit, and that may even be a good idea – all that “lonely god” stuff had probably gone as far as it could – but they overshot and made the first female Doctor kind of, well, wet. She just didn’t get to do very much. The impression you’re left with is that Chibnall is simply more interested in his male characters than his female ones.

The Bechdel Test is a way of measuring gender representation in fiction. To pass, a work needs to include a conversation between two named women about something other than a man. As it happens, I think the new season would pass this test – I’m fairly sure there’s a bit where the Doctor and Yaz (Mandip Gill) have a conversation about how to stop a spaceship-eating pig creature. But the point of that test is not that a work can only be valuable if it passes, but that it’s a hilariously low bar, which most films still, somehow, bang straight into.

Content from our partners
Prevent and protect – why looking after our oral health begins at home
Polling on the protocol: Westminster is a long way from Northern Ireland
How smart energy can deliver for smaller businesses

By the same token: it should have been easy, when casting the first female Doctor, to not end up telling a story largely about men. And yet.