Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Culture
  2. Sport
27 April 2016

Which paper couldn’t find room for Hillsborough on its front page?

Go on, guess.

By media mole

*/

The unlawful killing verdict in the Hillsborough inquest has, quite rightly, dominated the news over the last 24 hours. As Neil Atkinson wrote in these pages yesterday, the disaster was a national disgrace that is still ruining lives today.

It makes sense, therefore, that this morning’s newspapers would reflect this story on their front pages. They mostly look like this (all pictures via @suttonnick and #tomorrowspaperstoday):

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

It’s not just considered to be a “tabloid” story, either:

Even the right-wing papers – generally not the first in line to have a go at the police, this mole observes – had space for it:

Even the Express made space above its latest wonder drug story for the verdict:

And, of course, the Liverpool Echo has a fantastic splash:

So why, you might ask, did Britain’s biggest-selling daily paper not have room for this clearly important story?

Well, this has a lot to do with it:

The paper’s 1989 coverage was based on claims by unnamed police sources, blaming fans for the disaster. In 2012, after the Hillsborough Independent Panel report, the paper printed a front page apology:

Yet today it can only find room for a small leader column noting the tragedy:

And yet, the truth of what happened at Hillsborough still isn’t front page news, as far as the Sun is concerned.

Update, 12.39pm 27 April:

The Times has issued an apology for not including the Hillsborough story on its first edition:

“The Times lead with Hillsborough coverage on all our digital editions throughout the day. This morning we have covered it extensively in the paper with two spreads, the back page, a top leader and an interactive on the victims. We made a mistake with the front page of our first edition, and we fixed it for the second edition.”

The first edition looked like this:

The second, updated version: