Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Culture
  2. Nature
10 October 2017updated 06 Aug 2021 5:19pm

It is sad that we can no longer trust experts – but then, too many lie expertly

We have learned that a decade of higher study does not buy integrity.

By John Burnside

I was thinking about something that I thought was completely different, when an article in the Times caught my eye. Apparently, killer diseases are returning to the developed world because “Whole Foods mums” are refusing to give their children the MMR vaccine. (These womenfolk are also referred to as “organic mothers”, cementing the assumption that organic food and a suspicion of vaccines are part of an overall lifestyle choice.)

According to the Vaccine Alliance’s Dr Seth Berkley, this hippy-dippy decision is based on a mix of complacency, “anti-science sentiments” and celebrity meddling from, among others, Robert De Niro and the “former nude model Jenny McCarthy”. Dr Berkley added: “Experts don’t have the same credibility… We’re really in trouble when a Playboy bunny has the same authority as the American Academy of Paediatrics.”

Setting aside the sexism of reducing McCarthy to a “Playboy bunny” (she has since built a successful career as an actress, TV personality and author) and the patronising tone reserved for mothers who dare to make their own decisions about the family diet, it is difficult not to sympathise with Dr Berkley. He is, after all, an expert, and experts are supposed to be listened to.

Back in the good old days, experts spoke and the woman whose brain, uterus or lifestyle they were manipulating did as she was told.

Then something changed. I remember an encounter with a “chief scientist” sent by the Central Electricity Generating Board to talk to a little band of folk protesting about the increasing problem of acid rain some time during the 1980s. This expert swanned in, patronised our group, produced a few statistics to show that acid rain was a figment of our poor, untutored imaginations, and was about to swan out again when one of our number asked one last question. This led to a long dialogue, during which others in the group (a statistician, a systems designer and someone with a PhD in botany) politely demolished the half-baked scientific model that this chief scientist had thrown together earlier that day.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

We don’t trust politicians and we can’t trust banks, but we cannot trust our “experts”, either. We have learned that a decade of higher study does not buy integrity. Experts work for tobacco and drug companies, agribusiness and government – to name only a few systematic liars – and unless they are prepared to lose their jobs, they have to put a scientific spin on whatever the boss says.

Content from our partners
The truth about employability
Why we need a Minister for Citizen Experience
Powering careers that secure our net zero future

Like attack dogs, they have to pile in mercilessly if someone steps out of line, whether it’s a “Playboy bunny” or an advocate of more open-minded research into autism. This brings me to the other thing I was thinking about, which turned out not to be so different after all.

It was the US conservationist and author Rachel Carson who wrote, at a time when she was being vilified daily by paid experts on all sides, that ours is “an era dominated by industry, in which the right to make a dollar at whatever cost is seldom challenged”. She knew the danger posed by paid experts who, in cutting their cloth to suit their corporate masters, not only promulgated downright lies, but also undermined the very fabric of science.

It’s sad that the good experts are being lumped in with the bad but, having been lied to so expertly for so long, the public can hardly be expected to discern truth from falsehood.

This article appears in the 04 Oct 2017 issue of the New Statesman, How the rich got richer