Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Culture
24 August 2015updated 01 Sep 2015 4:55pm

BBFC director: Diary of a Teenage Girl didn’t earn its 18 certificate from an all-male panel

The film's distributor claimed that it was given an 18 certificate by an all-male panel. British Board of Film Classification director David Cooke has told the New Statesman that this was not the case.

By Barbara Speed

When Marielle Heller’s film Diary of a Teenage Girl was released last month, a huge amount of the coverage focused not on the film, but its classification. The film explores the sexual awakening of 15-year-old Minnie (played by Bel Powley), including her affair with her mother’s boyfriend Monroe (Alexander Skarsgård). Understandably, the director’s accusation that the film was awarded its 18 certificate by an all-male panel, despite its focus on a younger teen girl, provoked anger from filmmakers and cultural critics alike. 

However, David Cooke, the director of the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) has told the New Statesman that the accusation is unfounded. The film was classified according to the BBFC’s guidelines (created through regular public consultation), thanks mainly to its eight sex scenes, use of cocaine, LSD and marijuana, and what Cooke calls the “glamorisation” of drug use in the film. He added that the age gap between Minnie and Monroe, and the fact that Minnie is underage, would also have affected the decision. 

After the film was awarded an 18 certificate, the writer and producer submitted it for a reconsideration, along with letters explaining why they disputed the 18 rating. Cooke said that the BBFC rarely gives out information on its classification processes, but in this case he’s willing to clarify that the reconsideration was carried out by a mixed group of the BBFC’s senior management, including Catherine Anderson, the head of communications.

He also said that the film very clearly fits into the 18 classification:

It wasn’t a borderline case. As part of the reclassification process I saw the film for a second time, which can sometimes change my opinion, but in this case I felt exactly the same about the film.” 

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Cooke emphasised that the film’s classification shouldn’t be seen as a judgement on its depiction of female empowerment:

Content from our partners
The shrinking road to net zero
The tree-planting misconception
Is your business ready for corporate climate reporting?

As part of our remit, we have to be fair and consistent, and fixing a rating for this film involved looking at our guidelines and lots of precedents. The last thing we’d do is claim to offer a definitive interpretation of a film.” 

Sony Classics, the film’s distributor, has yet to respond to requests for comment. We will update the piece if and when they do.