Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Culture
30 March 2015

Wishy-washy liberalism or the sinister state? The revival of Aristotle in modern politics

We now live in the era of the “politics of wellbeing”. But what does that actually mean?

By Jules Evans

Image: WikiCommons

Tomorrow on Radio 4, I’m exploring the revival of Aristotle’s ideas in public policy, and in particular how they’re influencing policies in economics, mental health, education and civil society.

Aristotle believed that the aim of the good life is flourishing, or eudaimonia, by which he meant the fulfillment of our rational, social and spiritual nature through “virtuous activity”. He thought democracy was the form of government best suited to popular flourishing, and that governments should try and encourage flourishing though legislation, particularly through education.

His philosophy was, via Thomas Aquinas, the ruling philosophy of medieval Christendom until the early modern era, when philosophers from Machiavelli to Thomas Hobbes argued for a more realist and less idealistic form of government, one that worked with human nature as it is, rather than trying to shape it into what it ought to be. More recently, liberal philosophers like John Rawls or Sir Isaiah Berlin insisted the government should not try and promote any positive conception of the good life – that way lies illiberalism and tyranny.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

What’s changed? Partly a sense grew up in the 1990s that if government remained ethically neutral, the philosophy of the free market won by default. Economists like Amartya Sen and Jeffrey Sachs insisted classical economists had falsely tried to divorce economics from values like justice and flourishing.

At the same time, the new fields of Positive Psychology and behavioural economics tried to create a “science of flourishing”, showing what activities actually made people happier and more satisfied with their life – it turned out to be precisely the sort of “virtuous activity” promoted by Aristotle.

This led to a new “politics of well-being”, based on Aristotle’s idea that governments can and should promote our flourishing, through education, through supporting civil society, through mental health policy, and through a more just economics. As of 2010, the Office of National Statistics actually measures our levels of “eudaimonic well-being”, while the government has also launched a What Works Centre for Well-Being.

Today, according to Jon Cruddas MP – Ed Miliband’s chief policy coordinator – Aristotelian politics is “the new centre ground”. On the left, its supporters include Cruddas, Lord Maurice Glasman, and Tristram Hunt, who supports the introduction of “character education” in schools. On the right, Aristotelians include Nicky Morgan, who also supports “character education”; former policy advisor James O’Shaughnessy; David Willetts; and Oliver Letwin, who wrote his dissertation on Aristotle.

Cross-party Aristotelians include former head of the civil service Sir Gus O’Donnell, who I interview for the programme; Lord Richard Layard; the American philosophers Martha Nussbaum and Michael Sandel; and the American psychologist Martin Seligman.

Is this new politics of well-being sinister? Illiberal? Wishy-washy? Is it the triumph of the therapeutic state? It could potentially become all these things. But these are early days, and so far, its main achievement has been to put much greater political emphasis on mental health policy – one of the Lib Dems’ key manifesto pledges is on mental health policy, which is a historical first for British politics, and a direct result of the new politics of well-being.

Where the movement goes from here is up for grabs. It may well die out – Aristotle warned that a politics of the common good becomes impossible if societies become too unequal. For the moment, I support it. As an unashamed “popular philosopher”, I admire Aristotle’s vision of a democratic society where all citizens become philosophers.

Of course, his society was small, relatively homogenous, religious, and supported by a large slave population. The challenge is to actualise that vision in a vast, capitalist, democratic and multicultural state like ours.

Jules Evans is the author of “Philosophy for Life”. His programme on Aristotle is on BBC Radio 4 on 31 March at midday

Topics in this article :